Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: upgrade Reqwest to 0.12 [WIP] #23542

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mmastrac
Copy link
Member

@mmastrac mmastrac commented Apr 24, 2024

Blocked on TLS and deno_kv issues:

Caused by:
    Unknown TLS backend passed to `use_preconfigured_tls`

@mmastrac mmastrac changed the title feat: upgrade Request to 0.12 [WIP] feat: upgrade Reqwest to 0.12 [WIP] Apr 24, 2024
@mmastrac mmastrac force-pushed the reqwest_update branch 2 times, most recently from dd27eb2 to 4ba9036 Compare April 25, 2024 19:41
@bartlomieju bartlomieju added this to the 1.44 milestone May 5, 2024
@@ -113,12 +113,12 @@ fs3 = "0.5.0"
futures = "0.3.21"
glob = "0.3.1"
h2 = "0.4.4"
http = "1.0"
http = "1.1"
http-body-util = "0.1"
http_v02 = { package = "http", version = "0.2.9" }
httparse = "1.8.0"
hyper = { version = "=1.1.0", features = ["full"] }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quick question: would it be possible to bump hyper version to 1.3? Because reqwest has started to depend on hyper v1 since 0.12, and hyper 1.3 has my patch included which sets the initial number of concurrent send streams to a reasonable default value, upgrading hyper to v1.3 could also resolve #21789 too.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we definitely can. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants