Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(Series) - Added items() method #10923

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mobley-trent
Copy link

@mobley-trent mobley-trent commented Feb 14, 2024

@GPUtester
Copy link
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Admins can comment ok to test to allow this one PR to run or add to allowlist to allow all future PRs from the same author to run.

Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

See test report for an extended history of previous test failures. This is useful for diagnosing flaky tests.

     15 files  ± 0       15 suites  ±0   3h 17m 13s ⏱️ + 1m 44s
 13 032 tests + 1   12 100 ✅  - 1     931 💤 + 1  1 ❌ +1 
161 164 runs  +12  144 627 ✅  - 5  16 536 💤 +16  1 ❌ +1 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 557b691. ± Comparison against base commit ba5f3bc.

This pull request removes 2 and adds 3 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
dask.tests.test_tokenize ‑ test_tokenize_local_classes_from_different_contexts
dask.tests.test_tokenize ‑ test_tokenize_local_instances_from_different_contexts
dask.dataframe.tests.test_dataframe ‑ test_items
dask.tests.test_tokenize ‑ test_tokenize_local_classes_from_different_contexts[False]
dask.tests.test_tokenize ‑ test_tokenize_local_classes_from_different_contexts[True]
This pull request removes 1 skipped test and adds 2 skipped tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
dask.tests.test_tokenize ‑ test_tokenize_local_instances_from_different_contexts
dask.tests.test_tokenize ‑ test_tokenize_local_classes_from_different_contexts[False]
dask.tests.test_tokenize ‑ test_tokenize_local_classes_from_different_contexts[True]

@mobley-trent mobley-trent marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2024 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants