forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backport: Merge bitcoin#21750, 21727, 21856, 21897 #5997
Draft
vijaydasmp
wants to merge
3
commits into
dashpay:develop
Choose a base branch
from
vijaydasmp:bp22_36
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+18
−18
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vijaydasmp
changed the title
backport : Merge
backport : Merge bitcoin#21750, 21727, 21856, 21897
Apr 25, 2024
vijaydasmp
changed the title
backport : Merge bitcoin#21750, 21727, 21856, 21897
backport: Merge bitcoin#21750, 21727, 21856, 21897
Apr 25, 2024
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
bp22_36
branch
3 times, most recently
from
May 4, 2024 11:10
ce6ecaf
to
191f9d0
Compare
9096b13 net: remove unnecessary check of CNode::cs_vSend (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: It is not possible to have a node in `CConnman::vNodesDisconnected` and its reference count to be incremented - all `CNode::AddRef()` are done either before the node is added to `CConnman::vNodes` or while holding `CConnman::cs_vNodes` and the object being in `CConnman::vNodes`. So, the object being in `CConnman::vNodesDisconnected` and its reference count being zero means that it is not and will not start to be used by other threads. So, the lock of `CNode::cs_vSend` in `CConnman::DisconnectNodes()` will always succeed and is not necessary. Indeed all locks of `CNode::cs_vSend` are done either when the reference count is >0 or under the protection of `CConnman::cs_vNodes` and the node being in `CConnman::vNodes`. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK 9096b13 🏧 jnewbery: utACK 9096b13 Tree-SHA512: 910899cdcdc8934642eb0c40fcece8c3b01b7e20a0b023966b9d6972db6a885cb3a9a04e9562bae14d5833967e45e2ecb3687b94d495060c3da4b1f2afb0ac8f
47c3ea0 doc: add OSS-Fuzz section to fuzzing.md doc (Adam Jonas) Pull request description: This adds documentation about [Bitcoin Core's participation](https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/5699/files) in Google's OSS-Fuzz program and adds the caveat that the project may not disclose vulnerabilities within the 90-day window described in the [program's disclosure guidelines](https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started/bug-disclosure-guidelines/). ACKs for top commit: jonatack: ACK 47c3ea0 Tree-SHA512: 87bf0146fb74d1e4b3b8839e6c8f3d53046008a6d5b926ffe5b95be3c396a5e47e47967533422f60b04c4446482f49d210ada410b742f69781a7afde623d704d
7031721 rpc/listaddressgroupings: redefine inner-most array as ARR_FIXED (Karl-Johan Alm) 8500f7b rpc/createrawtransaction: redefine addresses as OBJ_USER_KEYS (Karl-Johan Alm) d9e2183 rpc: include OBJ_USER_KEY in RPCArg constructor checks (Karl-Johan Alm) Pull request description: This PR adjusts the two issues I encountered while developing a tool that converts RPCHelpMan objects into bindings for other language(s). The first is in createrawtransaction, where the address part, e.g. bc1qabc in > createrawtransaction '[]' '[{"bc1qabc": 1.0}]' is declared as a `Type::OBJ`, when in reality it should be a `Type::OBJ_USER_KEYS`, defined as such: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/5925f1e652768a9502831b9ccf78d16cf3c37d29/src/rpc/util.h#L126 (coincidentally, this is the first and only (afaict) usage of this `RPCArg::Type`). The second is in the `listaddressgroupings` RPC, which returns an array of arrays of arrays, where the innermost one is a tuple-thingie with an optional 3rd item; this is an `ARR_FIXED`, not an `ARR`. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 7031721 🐀 Tree-SHA512: 769377416c6226d1738a956fb685498e009f9e7eb2d45bc679b81c5364b9520fdbcb49392c937ab45598aa0d33589e8e6a59ccc101cf8d8e7dfdafd58d4eefd0
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bitcoin backports