Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): upgrade Apache Jena Fuseki docker image to v2.0.9 (DEV-1299) #2185

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

mpro7
Copy link
Collaborator

@mpro7 mpro7 commented Sep 1, 2022

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix: represents bug fixes
  • Refactor: represents production code refactoring
  • Feature: represents a new feature
  • Documentation: documentation changes (no production code change)
  • Chore: maintenance tasks (no production code change)
  • Style: styles updates (no production code change)
  • Test: all about tests: adding, refactoring tests (no production code change)
  • Other... Please describe:

Issue Number: DEV-1299

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Does this PR change client-test-data?

  • Yes (don't forget to update the JS-LIB team about the change)
  • No

Other information

@mpro7 mpro7 self-assigned this Sep 1, 2022
@mpro7 mpro7 changed the title chore(deps): upgrade Apache Jena Fuseki docker image to v2.0.9 chore(deps): upgrade Apache Jena Fuseki docker image to v2.0.9 (DEV-1299) Sep 1, 2022
@swarmia
Copy link

swarmia bot commented Sep 1, 2022

✅  Linked to Story DEV-1299 · Upgrade Jena Fuseki to 4.6.0

@mpro7 mpro7 marked this pull request as draft September 8, 2022 09:59
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 86.68% // Head: 6.13% // Decreases project coverage by -80.55% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (fc33f6a) compared to base (26e9596).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #2185       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.68%   6.13%   -80.56%     
==========================================
  Files         250     268       +18     
  Lines       28252   28317       +65     
==========================================
- Hits        24490    1737    -22753     
- Misses       3762   26580    +22818     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...p-shared/src/main/scala/dsp/valueobjects/Iri.scala 91.91% <100.00%> (-1.90%) ⬇️
...sp-shared/src/main/scala/dsp/valueobjects/V2.scala 90.27% <100.00%> (+0.27%) ⬆️
...bapi/src/main/scala/org/knora/webapi/package.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...i/src/main/scala/org/knora/webapi/core/State.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...rc/main/scala/org/knora/webapi/LanguageCodes.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...c/main/scala/org/knora/webapi/OntologySchema.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...c/main/scala/org/knora/webapi/core/AppRouter.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...c/main/scala/org/knora/webapi/util/LogAspect.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
.../main/scala/org/knora/webapi/auth/JWTService.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
.../main/scala/org/knora/webapi/core/HttpServer.scala 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
... and 220 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@mpro7
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mpro7 commented Jan 3, 2023

Resolved by #2362

@mpro7 mpro7 closed this Jan 3, 2023
@mpro7 mpro7 deleted the apache-jena-fuseki-upgrade branch January 3, 2023 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant