Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(libsdk): cfs_close not check return value. #3204

Closed

Conversation

longerfly
Copy link
Collaborator

What this PR does / why we need it:
cfs_close not check return value.

Which issue this PR fixes:

fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Signed-off-by: baihailong <baihailong@oppo.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop-v3.3.2@99e91d8). Click here to learn what that means.

❗ Current head 2da3b65 differs from pull request most recent head e9a2251. Consider uploading reports for the commit e9a2251 to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
util/auditlog/auditlog.go 66.66% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             develop-v3.3.2    #3204   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   40.51%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?      537           
  Lines                     ?   108510           
  Branches                  ?        0           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?    43964           
  Misses                    ?    60833           
  Partials                  ?     3713           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@leonrayang leonrayang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants