Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adds podman support #732

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ohadlevy
Copy link

@ohadlevy ohadlevy commented Aug 8, 2020

Hello, Please feel free to ignore this PR, but since I did the work, I thought I'll at least offer it.

I'm running on Fedora as my base machine, and was unable to run the container due to selinux limitations, I ended up rebuilding a new container based on fedora.

Creates a dockerfile that can run via podman on fedora/centos/rhel systems
with SELinux enabled.
@kueblc
Copy link
Collaborator

kueblc commented Dec 2, 2020

Hi @ohadlevy,

Thanks for the contribution! I apologize it has taken me a while to get around to review.

I am not familiar with docker myself. The existing docker configuration was contributed by another community member. Could you explain the benefits of this configuration as well as how to use it?

@kueblc kueblc changed the base branch from master to development December 2, 2020 14:50
@ohadlevy
Copy link
Author

ohadlevy commented Dec 6, 2020

Hi,

The main value (for me) was the ability to run it on my system, the base container that is currently offered does not follow SELinux and my system ended up rejecting the various network configuration changes.

another plus (for me again) that I was able to build it using podman vs docker, as docker is slowly phasing out on some common distributions.

in order to test it, I've published the image at quay.io/ohadlevy/tuya, so if you are using docker-compose you could simply change the image reference (from tuya:latest to quay.io/ohadlevy/tuya:latest)

@Cyber1000
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I originally added the docker-functionality on tuya. The main reason that I used a ubuntu-based image was that I could use install_prereq.sh without problems. I'll try @pdugas approach (#796) with a an alpine-image.

@ohadlevy Your image btw. isn't specific to podman, it would work perfectly well with docker, since these buildfiles are interchangeable after OCI (Open Container Initiative). It is just using an fedora-minimal instead of a ubuntu-minmal image inside the container.
I know it's a long time since you opened the PR, but do you still know some errors you got? Did you build from original Dockerfile in this project with docker or podman?
Since fedora prefers podman and you need to change some internals to get docker working (https://fedoramagazine.org/docker-and-fedora-32/) podman would be the way to go. Normally everything from the README should be interchangeable for podman (for example use "podman build" instead of "docker build" and podman-compose instead of docker-compose)

@ohadlevy
Copy link
Author

ohadlevy commented Feb 1, 2021

I know it's a long time since you opened the PR, but do you still know some errors you got? Did you build from original Dockerfile in this project with docker or podman?

the main issue was with SELinux alerts on my host machine, I assume it depends on the base image (e.g. ubunutu) and usage of host networking. using a fedora based image eliminated that concern. regardless, if alphine works, I'm more than happy :)

I actually built it using quay, which is building using docker (I think) but it worked just as well on my local podman instance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants