Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some tricks for shave bytes (-11B for esm) #421

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RealPeha
Copy link

@RealPeha RealPeha commented Jan 16, 2022

  • update.js - Use bitwise NOT for indexOf check
  • parse.js - Optimized check for != undefined
  • hash.js - Remove the extra condition and variable
  • compile.js - Just moved the condition
  • styled.js - replacing if with ternary operator

Before:
1188 B: goober.esm.js.gz
1188 B: goober.modern.js.gz
1183 B: goober.cjs.gz
1257 B: goober.umd.js.gz

After:
1177 B: goober.esm.js.gz (-11B)
1177 B: goober.modern.js.gz (-11B)
1175 B: goober.cjs.gz (-8B)
1240 B: goober.umd.js.gz (-17B)

* update.js - Use bitwise XOR for indexOf check
* parse.js - Optimized check for !=undefined
* hash.js - Remove the extra condition and variable
* compile.js - Just moved the condition
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2022

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/cristianbote/goober-rocks/2HiUmSoiLuD3vzhRLs9sZNjzgeVa
✅ Preview: https://goober-rocks-git-fork-realpeha-shave-some-tricks-cristianbote.vercel.app

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2022

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit a41e580:

Sandbox Source
Vanilla Configuration

@RealPeha RealPeha changed the title Some tricks for shave bytes (-10B for esm) Some tricks for shave bytes (-11B for esm) Jan 17, 2022
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ export let parse = (obj, selector) => {
})
: key
);
} else if (val != undefined) {
} else if (val + 1) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

undefined + 1 = NaN but null + 1 = 1. So you can use this trick to handle null values.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Comment on lines -51 to +55
let _as = tag;

// If this is a string -- checking that is has a first valid char
if (tag[0]) {
// Try to assign the _as with the given _as value if any
_as = _props.as || tag;
// And remove it
delete _props.as;
}
// Try to assign the _as with the given _as value if any
let _as = (tag[0] && _props.as) || tag;
// And remove it
tag[0] && delete _props.as;
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tried this one locally and increases the overall size 😵‍💫

sheet.data.indexOf(css) == -1 && (sheet.data = append ? css + sheet.data : sheet.data + css);
~sheet.data.indexOf(css) || (sheet.data = append ? css + sheet.data : sheet.data + css);
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙌 this one shaves around 4B

Comment on lines +44 to +64
update(
(cache[className] =
cache[className] ||
// If there's no entry for the current className
// Parse it
parse(
// For keyframes
keyframes
? // Build the _ast_-ish structure if needed
{
['@keyframes ' + className]:
stringifiedCompiled !== compiled ? compiled : astish(compiled)
}
: stringifiedCompiled !== compiled
? compiled
: astish(compiled),
global ? '' : '.' + className
)),
sheet,
append
);
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this is where the shaves are huge. The large downside though is the readability and maintenance effort if we keep it in this form. I would rather see this as a last resort.

Comment on lines -36 to +39
tail = res === false ? '' : res;
tail = res;
}
}
return out + next + (tail == null ? '' : tail);
return out + next + (tail == null || tail === false ? '' : tail);
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For some reason this also increases the size.

Copy link
Owner

@cristianbote cristianbote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants