Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Explain what sort of workflows CWL is for. #36

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Explain what sort of workflows CWL is for. #36

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ src="https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-website/raw/main/openstand-
The Common Workflow Language (CWL) is an open standard for describing analysis
workflows and tools in a way that makes them portable and scalable across a
variety of software and hardware environments, from workstations to cluster,
cloud, and high performance computing (HPC) environments. CWL is designed to
cloud, and high performance computing (HPC) environments.

CWL is for dataflow style batch analysis, where the units of processing are command line programs.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we think it would be beneficial to comment here on some known workflows / use cases that CWL does NOT handle well?

Example from chat:

"explicitly not for business process modeling"

And any other use cases that users can think of that aren't intended use cases?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would add something clarifying the use for batch processing vs interactive processing, as sometimes we've had confusion about workflows having being able to interact with external services such as as databases or other APIs

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we think it would be beneficial to comment here on some known workflows / use cases that CWL does NOT handle well?

It could (and I see the value in that!), but it probably leaves the reader with a better feeling to not have a list of negatives when they first learn about something. I also don't want this introduction to be too long or wordy. A bit tricky to balance!

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I can see where you are coming from there. It might also dissuade someone from trying it out if they do not fully understand what is meant by the item listed as "not supported" (IE cwl could be a use case for their problem, but since they don't understand the terminology of the item they might just not try it out). After thinking about it, it might do more harm than good.

CWL is designed to
meet the needs of data-intensive science, such as Bioinformatics, Medical
Imaging, Astronomy, High Energy Physics, and Machine Learning.

Expand Down