Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add tests for PublicViewer support #931

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 22, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: filariow
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign alexeykazakov for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Signed-off-by: Francesco Ilario <filario@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Francesco Ilario <filario@redhat.com>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
5.7% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@MatousJobanek
Copy link
Collaborator

before I do any review of the code itself, I'd like to understand why you want to create a brand new test-suite, why you don't want to incorporate it into the already existing one.
Another test-suite will increase the time execution, may cause test-coverage duplication, and increases the complexity of the setup.

Copy link
Contributor

@sadlerap sadlerap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some small nits

Comment on lines +128 to +129
oc delete -n ${HOST_NS} pods -l control-plane=controller-manager
oc delete -n ${HOST_NS} pod -l name=registration-service
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: What's the difference between oc delete pods (plural) and oc delete pod (singular)? I'd prefer a convention that we stick to.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a typo 😄 good catch!

@@ -641,7 +625,7 @@ func runWatcher(t *testing.T, awaitilities wait.Awaitilities) *sync.WaitGroup {
Get()
t.Logf("stopping the watch after %s", time.Since(started))

require.EqualError(t, err, "unexpected error when reading response body. Please retry. Original error: context deadline exceeded", "The call should be terminated by the context timeout")
assert.EqualError(t, err, "unexpected error when reading response body. Please retry. Original error: context deadline exceeded", "The call should be terminated by the context timeout")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Revert this back, and I think checks will pass:

Suggested change
assert.EqualError(t, err, "unexpected error when reading response body. Please retry. Original error: context deadline exceeded", "The call should be terminated by the context timeout")
require.EqualError(t, err, "unexpected error when reading response body. Please retry. Original error: context deadline exceeded", "The call should be terminated by the context timeout")

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants