Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #212 [1710490545380] #355

Closed
c4-judge opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #212 [1710490545380] #355

c4-judge opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue duplicate-172 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards withdrawn by judge Special case: this finding was auto-generated by a judge and is now withdrawn; it can be ignored

Comments

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #212 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows:

[L-01] PrizeVault._tryGetAssetDecimals() may return erroneous decimals
@c4-judge c4-judge added the 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value label Mar 15, 2024
c4-judge added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2024
@c4-judge
0xmystery issue #355 (File generated from upgraded finding by judge h…
ee69206 
…ansfriese)
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

hansfriese marked the issue as duplicate of #172

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

hansfriese marked the issue as satisfactory

@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Mar 15, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

This auto-generated issue was withdrawn by hansfriese

@c4-judge c4-judge added downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax withdrawn by judge Special case: this finding was auto-generated by a judge and is now withdrawn; it can be ignored and removed 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value labels Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue duplicate-172 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards withdrawn by judge Special case: this finding was auto-generated by a judge and is now withdrawn; it can be ignored
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@c4-judge