New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
QA Report #237
Comments
Generic findings well elaborated: 26 L and 58 NC |
raymondfam marked the issue as high quality report |
trmid (sponsor) confirmed |
[L-12] mitigation: GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-vault#86 |
[L-11] mitigation: GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-vault#87 |
hansfriese marked the issue as grade-a |
hansfriese marked the issue as selected for report |
hansfriese marked the issue as not selected for report |
Invalid Known findings [L-02] Subtraction in unchecked block is unsafe [L-04] Some tokens may revert on large transfers [L-06] Use abi.encodeCall() instead of abi.encodeWithSignature()/abi.encodeWithSelector() [L-07] Upgradable contracts not taken into account [L-10] Unchecked Return Values of the approve() Function [L-12] Unsafe use of transfer()/transferFrom() with IERC20 [L-15] Missing checks for address(0x0) when updating address state variables [L-16] Lack of Parameter Validation in Constructor/Initializer] ... Most findings are dupes of the known ones. I recommend filtering them when you submit with your bot results. |
hansfriese marked the issue as grade-b |
hansfriese marked the issue as grade-a |
[N-37] mitigation: GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-vault#89 |
[N-22] mitigation: GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-vault#90 |
[N-20] mitigation: GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-vault#91 |
[N-15] mitigation: GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-vault#92 |
See the markdown file with the details of this report here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: