Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug: checkly_check permadiff on ssl_check_domain attribute #282

Open
0x416e746f6e opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #286
Open

bug: checkly_check permadiff on ssl_check_domain attribute #282

0x416e746f6e opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #286
Labels
type: bug Something isn't working

Comments

@0x416e746f6e
Copy link

Terraform version

v1.5.7

Provider version

v1.7.3

Steps to reproduce

  • create browser-check with terraform
  • set its ssl_check_domain to the domain FQDN
  • do terraform apply
  • do it again. the result will be a diff on ssl_check_domain:
  ~ resource "checkly_check" "checkity_check" {
        id                        = "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx"
        name                      = "https://fully.qualified.domain.name.com"
      ~ ssl_check_domain          = "BROWSER" -> "fully.qualified.domain.name.com"
        tags                      = []
        # (18 unchanged attributes hidden)

        # (3 unchanged blocks hidden)
    }

What is expected?

no permadiff

What is actually happening?

permadiff. right after successful terraform apply run, the diff is still there.

System Info

No response

Any additional comments?

No response

@0x416e746f6e 0x416e746f6e added the type: bug Something isn't working label Jan 26, 2024
@0x416e746f6e
Copy link
Author

still happens in 1.7.5

@0x416e746f6e 0x416e746f6e linked a pull request Feb 20, 2024 that will close this issue
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant