Reduced number of dependencies pulled from futures #199
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Good idea! Travis indicates that
Heh, I don't actually use rustfmt. Would it be possible to avoid the formatting changes in this pull request? It looks like a bunch of the lines that are changing are only formatting changes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
futuresis kind of a heavy crate, and this PR reduces the number of sub-crates being included by capnp-rpc/capnp-futures by only pulling exactly the sub-crates that are used (futures_core, futures_channel, futures_io and futures_util).Unfortunately, it seems my rustfmt didn't agree with yours - do you have any idea why?