Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

github: Restore raft testing on other filesystems #647

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cole-miller
Copy link
Contributor

I neglected to set this up when doing the raft import, and was reminded because this additional testing should pick up the original issue that this patch---since reverted by #641---addressed.

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller cole.miller@canonical.com

@cole-miller
Copy link
Contributor Author

Indeed, failures with xfs and btrfs are back:

2024-04-26T10:07:16.7647685Z UvWriterClose/aio                                           
2024-04-26T10:07:16.7648335Z   dir-fs=btrfs                                              [ ERROR ]
2024-04-26T10:07:16.7649228Z Error: test/raft/unit/test_uv_writer.c:49: assertion failed: status == result->status (0 == 13)
2024-04-26T10:07:16.7649925Z Error: child killed by signal 6 (Aborted)
2024-04-26T10:07:16.7650721Z   dir-fs=ext4                                               [ OK    ] [ 0.03586379 / 0.00012271 CPU ]
2024-04-26T10:07:16.7651343Z   dir-fs=xfs                                                [ ERROR ]
2024-04-26T10:07:16.7652115Z Error: test/raft/unit/test_uv_writer.c:49: assertion failed: status == result->status (0 == 13)

@letFunny
Copy link

Does this mean that the CI is no longer going to be green? If that is the case, do we plan to fix this tests?

@cole-miller
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't plan to merge this with the tests failing, we need to fix them one way or another. Currently trying to figure out whether there's a proper fix that doesn't cause the same issue as canonical/raft#485.

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
In practice it seems we want to use vsnprintf all over the place, so I
don't know what the point of enabling this is.

Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Cole Miller <cole.miller@canonical.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants