Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support ESM import #2199

Open
chriscarrollsmith opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Support ESM import #2199

chriscarrollsmith opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@chriscarrollsmith
Copy link

Description

Currently, when I import js-beautifier to an ES module using an import statement and then log the object to the console, here's what I see:

import * as beautify from 'js-beautify';
console.log(beautify)

[Module: null prototype] {
default: [Function: beautify] {
js: [Function: js_beautify] { defaultOptions: [Function (anonymous)] },
css: [Function: css_beautify] { defaultOptions: [Function (anonymous)] },
html: [Function: style_html] { defaultOptions: [Function (anonymous)] },
js_beautify: [Function: js_beautify] { defaultOptions: [Function (anonymous)] },
css_beautify: [Function: css_beautify] { defaultOptions: [Function (anonymous)] },
html_beautify: [Function: style_html] { defaultOptions: [Function (anonymous)] }
}
}

Honestly not great, because it means I have to access the different beautifers through the default property, like this:

beautify.default.html()

At minimum, this needs to be added to the README so folks know the correct syntax. Preferably, the code should also be updated to better support ESM import.

@bitwiseman
Copy link
Member

@chriscarrollsmith If you know how to update for better ESM support without breaking existing code, PR welcome.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants