Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving to new using schema structure for resource prop rules #3236

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 12, 2024

Conversation

kddejong
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

  • Moving to new using schema structure for resource prop rules

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.42%. Comparing base (41277c6) to head (d1bb409).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3236      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.51%   92.42%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         308      308              
  Lines       10673    10667       -6     
  Branches     2272     2270       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         9874     9859      -15     
- Misses        459      467       +8     
- Partials      340      341       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kddejong kddejong merged commit d394c83 into aws-cloudformation:main May 12, 2024
21 of 22 checks passed
@kddejong kddejong deleted the v1-cleanup/2024/05/11 branch May 12, 2024 03:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant