Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add testing RC git action job #1951

Open
wants to merge 51 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add testing RC git action job #1951

wants to merge 51 commits into from

Conversation

utkarsharma2
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds convenience to test Provider RC releases with SDK by adding a GitHub job which raises PR from the GitHub issue.

@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 marked this pull request as draft June 1, 2023 15:09
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (bbb4541) 91.69% compared to head (0442b08) 91.69%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1951   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.69%   91.69%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        4250     4250           
  Branches      511      511           
=======================================
  Hits         3897     3897           
  Misses        257      257           
  Partials       96       96           
Flag Coverage Δ
PythonSDK 91.69% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 changed the title Add testing RC gitaction job Add testing RC git action job Jun 2, 2023
@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2023 12:40
Copy link
Collaborator

@tatiana tatiana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@utkarsharma2, it would be great to see documentation on how to trigger this workflow!

@pankajkoti pankajkoti removed their request for review June 7, 2023 12:40
@pankajastro
Copy link
Contributor

@utkarsharma2 does this PR still require, we added a workflow in PR #1995 and @Lee-W is working on #2009 to clean up and resue the provider workflow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants