Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring test suite using StreamData #919

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shinnokdisengir
Copy link
Contributor

TODO

refactoring test suite

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.91%. Comparing base (20fa298) to head (a046b19).
Report is 68 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #919      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.62%   68.91%   +0.29%     
==========================================
  Files         228      301      +73     
  Lines        6667     7644     +977     
==========================================
+ Hits         4575     5268     +693     
- Misses       2092     2376     +284     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@shinnokdisengir shinnokdisengir force-pushed the test-suite-2.0 branch 9 times, most recently from a386639 to ac30b5e Compare April 5, 2024 15:30
@shinnokdisengir shinnokdisengir force-pushed the test-suite-2.0 branch 4 times, most recently from 15808f7 to f8bc9a0 Compare April 15, 2024 11:07
@shinnokdisengir shinnokdisengir force-pushed the test-suite-2.0 branch 8 times, most recently from 4412eeb to ef42039 Compare April 23, 2024 15:17
@shinnokdisengir shinnokdisengir force-pushed the test-suite-2.0 branch 6 times, most recently from d4fff9e to 3fa3a8b Compare May 6, 2024 10:32
@shinnokdisengir shinnokdisengir force-pushed the test-suite-2.0 branch 10 times, most recently from 21a6a37 to 3c7cdd6 Compare May 10, 2024 08:27
Changed
- using exandra -- waiting for database project
- implemented jwt + public/private key
- wip group tests
- squashed all failure
- polishing
- removed one_of_constant -> member_of
- splitted tests
- WIP device generator
- completed device generator...but using opaque data (TODO change it)
- basic datetime generator
- WIP device generator
- using Keyword.validate!
- WIP insert into db, IPNET error
- completed device WIP id doesn't match
- completed base tests device
- polishing
- renamed realm -> keyspace
- completed group generator + setup + case
- wip group test (group_name "!" doesn't work)
- added encoded_id field to device test
- unlinked Conn <-> Database cases
- fixed realm name
- fixed valid group name test
- added already exists

Signed-off-by: Gabriele Ghio <gabriele.ghio@secomind.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant