Skip to content

[RFC] Standardize naming for pipe, pipeline, handler, middleware. #420

Description

@marksiemers

Description

This mostly has to do with the folder that custom pipes are placed in. The auth generator uses handlers but there are preferences for other names, and it doesn't seem to be consistent.

If a naming convention is chosen, it may have an effect beyond just the folder name.

AFAIK, these are the potential options for names:
Could we get a vote on those names (for the folder), we can change the auth generator to use it as well - I may be able to incorporate that into the PR that I have going for it:

  • handlers
  • pipes
  • pipelines
  • middleware

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions