Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding/fixing gates in lab_dev transformations #398

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kaspernielsen96
Copy link
Collaborator

@kaspernielsen96 kaspernielsen96 commented May 9, 2024

Context:
Fixing mistakes of the Rgate and adding Identity to lab_dev

Description of the Change:
Correcting the Abc triplet of the Rgate from squeezing Abc to rotation Abc and updating the tests. Adding the identity transformation and tests of it.

Benefits:
More (and correct) gates in lab_dev.

Possible Drawbacks:

Related GitHub Issues:

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.65%. Comparing base (c987bd0) to head (a28a420).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #398      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    87.43%   87.65%   +0.22%     
===========================================
  Files           81       81              
  Lines         6135     6142       +7     
===========================================
+ Hits          5364     5384      +20     
+ Misses         771      758      -13     
Files Coverage Δ
...mustard/lab_dev/transformations/transformations.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c987bd0...a28a420. Read the comment docs.

@kaspernielsen96
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The Tensorflow test worked for the initial push. The difference to the second is I ran the 'black formatting' and now Tensorflow fails.

@kaspernielsen96 kaspernielsen96 marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2024 14:19
@ziofil ziofil self-requested a review May 13, 2024 20:34
Copy link
Collaborator

@ziofil ziofil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

.github/CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
kaspernielsen96 and others added 2 commits May 13, 2024 18:05
Co-authored-by: Yuan YAO <16817699+sylviemonet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuan YAO <16817699+sylviemonet@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@sylviemonet sylviemonet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to go! Nice work Kasper

@kaspernielsen96 kaspernielsen96 merged commit 680bf64 into develop May 15, 2024
8 checks passed
@kaspernielsen96 kaspernielsen96 deleted the newgate branch May 15, 2024 15:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants