Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

S138 bulk connection instructions #222

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022

Conversation

eschultink
Copy link
Member

Features

  • TODO files for setup of bulk connections in Worklytics UX

Change implications

  • dependencies added/changed? no

default = {}

# TODO: fix these validations; logically correct, but Terraform doesn't allow validation conditions
# to depend on values of other variables
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI if you want to include the link of the issue to support this on their GH -> hashicorp/terraform#25609

per_setting_instructions_text = length(var.settings_to_provide) > 0 ? "\n${join("\n", tolist(local.per_setting_instructions))}" : ""
}

resource "local_file" "todo-worklytics-connection" {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is already present in worklytics-psoxy-connection module; not sure if intended or it is duplicated

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, it's a more general case. the other one has a url param that's not relevant for the bulk case.

@eschultink eschultink merged commit fc966f9 into v0.4.9-rc Dec 21, 2022
@eschultink eschultink deleted the s138-bulk-connection-instructions branch December 21, 2022 17:04
@eschultink eschultink restored the s138-bulk-connection-instructions branch January 7, 2023 00:56
@eschultink eschultink deleted the s138-bulk-connection-instructions branch January 7, 2023 00:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants