OptimizeInstructions: Add missing invalidation check in consecutive e…

…quality test (#6596)

This existed before #6495 but became noticeable there. We only looked at
the fallthrough values in the later part of areConsecutiveInputsEqual, but
there can be invalidation due to the non-fallthrough part:

(i32.add
  (local.get $x)
  (block
    (local.set $x ..)
    (local.get $x)
  )
)

The set can cause the local.get to differ the second time. To fix this,
check if the non-fallthrough part invalidates the fallthrough (but only
on the right hand side).

Fixes #6593

src/passes/OptimizeInstructions.cpp

@@ -2501,11 +2501,33 @@ struct OptimizeInstructions
     // Ignore extraneous things and compare them syntactically. We can also
     // look at the full fallthrough for both sides now.
     left = Properties::getFallthrough(left, passOptions, *getModule());
+    auto* originalRight = right;
     right = Properties::getFallthrough(right, passOptions, *getModule());
     if (!ExpressionAnalyzer::equal(left, right)) {
       return false;
     }
 
+    // We must also not have non-fallthrough effects that invalidate us, such as
+    // this situation:
+    //
+    //  (local.get $x)
+    //  (block
+    //    (local.set $x ..)
+    //    (local.get $x)
+    //  )
+    //
+    // The fallthroughs are identical, but the set may cause us to read a
+    // different value.
+    if (originalRight != right) {
+      // TODO: We could be more precise here and ignore right itself in
+      //       originalRightEffects.
+      auto originalRightEffects = effects(originalRight);
+      auto rightEffects = effects(right);
+      if (originalRightEffects.invalidates(rightEffects)) {
+        return false;
+      }
+    }
+
     // To be equal, they must also be known to return the same result
     // deterministically.
     return !Properties::isGenerative(left);