Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(hedera): added demo TT file for hedera mainnet network : krypc #885

Open
wants to merge 34 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AnithaKrypC
Copy link
Contributor

@AnithaKrypC AnithaKrypC commented Mar 5, 2024

added demo TT file for hedera mainnet network

Updated test cases

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 14, 2024

Deploy Preview for tradetrust-mainnet ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 79c0375
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/tradetrust-mainnet/deploys/6601184f764fe800085d91e8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-885--tradetrust-mainnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Comment on lines 71 to 82
// await t.expect(EndorsementChainAddressMinter.count).eql(4);
// await t.expect(EndorsementChainAddress1.count).eql(4);
// await t.expect(EndorsementChainAddress2.count).eql(2);
//
// await t.expect(DocumentIssuedAction.count).eql(1);
//
// await t.expect(EndorseNomineeAction.count).eql(1);
// await t.expect(ChangeOwnershipAction.count).eql(1);
// await t.expect(TransferHoldershipAction.count).eql(1);
//
// await t.expect(SurrenderToIssuerAction.count).eql(1);
// await t.expect(SurrenderAcceptedAction.count).eql(1);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are all these test commented out?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because of this issue
Screenshot from 2024-03-22 15-27-31

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it should be the RPC url that was used. can use 1 that can be queried and it should be using an archived node

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 18, 2024

👷 Deploy request for reference-implementation pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 77ef311

@AnithaKrypC
Copy link
Contributor Author

AnithaKrypC commented May 16, 2024

We updated RPC Url in configuration. Tested locally and attached screenshot also @isaackps

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants