Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_* types: #311

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

DimitrisStaratzis
Copy link
Member

@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis commented Jan 26, 2024

No description provided.

@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis linked an issue Jan 26, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis marked this pull request as draft January 26, 2024 18:44
@ihnorton ihnorton changed the title add support for TILEDB_GEOM_WKB and TILEDB_GEOM_WKB: [2.21 only] add support for TILEDB_GEOM_WKB and TILEDB_GEOM_WKB: Jan 30, 2024
@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis changed the title [2.21 only] add support for TILEDB_GEOM_WKB and TILEDB_GEOM_WKB: update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_* types: Mar 21, 2024
@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis changed the title update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_* types: Update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_* types: Mar 21, 2024
@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis changed the title Update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_* types: Update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_ types: Mar 21, 2024
@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis changed the title Update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_ types: Update to TileDB-2.21.0 and add support for the TILEDB_GEOM_* types: Mar 21, 2024
@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2024 00:02
Copy link
Member

@Shelnutt2 Shelnutt2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also @perrygeo what do we need to push the geometries down?

@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis merged commit f442473 into master Mar 21, 2024
7 checks passed
@DimitrisStaratzis DimitrisStaratzis deleted the dstara/fix_issue_310 branch March 21, 2024 10:21
@perrygeo
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! The geometry push down shouldn't be affected by the new types since we don't reference the geometry attribute directly; the spatial indexing happens on the integer dimensions and the geometry itself is treated as an opaque payload. That said, I owe you some tests to confirm, but it should be good to go.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants