CSS Functions: Replace clamp() function explanation

[shonebinu]

Because

The explanation for clamp() function in CSS isn't easily digestible.

This PR

• Add better explanation for the clamp() function in CSS.

Issue

Closes #XXXXX

Additional Information

Pull Request Requirements

• I have thoroughly read and understand The Odin Project Contributing Guide
• The title of this PR follows the location of change: brief description of change format, e.g. Intro to HTML and CSS lesson: Fix link text
• The Because section summarizes the reason for this PR
• The This PR section has a bullet point list describing the changes in this PR
• If this PR addresses an open issue, it is linked in the Issue section
• If any lesson files are included in this PR, they have been previewed with the Markdown preview tool to ensure it is formatted correctly
• If any lesson files are included in this PR, they follow the Layout Style Guide

[MaoShizhong]

Thanks for opening this PR @shonebinu.

Could you elaborate on specifically what about the current lesson's verbiage you find not very digestible? In my personal opinion (which of course is just my opinion), the current verbiage is adequate and I'm not sure I find the proposed changes a significant improvement over the current - only that it's a different explanation (sideways, basically).

I haven't personally noticed this part being a common pain point in the community either, hence I'm hesitant to approve changes to entire sections without a very clear improvement or justification. Different people will find different wordings better or worse, after all.

One thing I do have a slight problem with though, is the proposed wording here:

So, the clamp() function considers the screen size...

Where that has room to be interpreted as a built-in behaviour of the clamp() function (to consider the screen size). It's not, it's just what happens in the given example.
e.g. clamp(100px, 50%, 500px) will not take into account the screen size, only the parent element's size.

[MaoShizhong]

Closing due to no response, and does not look like there's a significant need for action on this.