New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support incremental detailed routing #5059
Support incremental detailed routing #5059
Conversation
Signed-off-by: osamahammad21 <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: osamahammad21 <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Osama <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: osamahammad21 <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Osama <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Osama <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Osama <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Osama <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Osama <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clang-tidy made some suggestions
The antenna checker tests should probably stay verbose, no? |
Should I add -verbose to the check_antennas command? That would make the tests extra verbose. The other solution would be making different levels of verbosity. |
Signed-off-by: osamahammad21 <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
Yes add -verbose |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Signed-off-by: osamahammad21 <osama21@aucegypt.edu>
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
@maliberty ready to merge. |
Adding support for incremental detailed routing needed for post-routing optimizations such as repairing antenna violations. Other than incremental detailed routing support, this PR includes the following: