Critter combined tree #113
Conversation
source files for tree visualisations in issue:#110
add 4 Subtrees into megatree with sequential prioritizaition
| // First Guard fo Selector for Territory End. | ||
| guard: { // Implementation of scared Critter | ||
| componentPresent: "Behaviors:FindNearbyPlayers", | ||
| values: ["N charactersWithinRange != null"], // Adjust for Nemesis / Scary Creatures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We discussed this in the meeting today.
The N is a parsing directive that specifiies whether the condition has the form type fieldName operator or type fieldName operator valueOrReference.
Technically, we could use V charactersWithinRange != null to ensure that the list itself is defined and not null (checking agains the value null). However, this is not the semantics we are looking for.
Therefore, using the nonEmpty operator on the collection with no value to check against (N) is the solution:
| values: ["N charactersWithinRange != null"], // Adjust for Nemesis / Scary Creatures | |
| values: ["N charactersWithinRange nonEmpty"], // Adjust for Nemesis / Scary Creatures |
| // Territory would to be implemented as Component | ||
| // Implementation of territorial Critter | ||
| componentPresent: "Behaviours:Territory", | ||
| values: ["F Territory != null"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This would try to make a lookup of a field (indicated by F) named null.
However, I believe you want to check against the value null, thus using V would be correct.
| values: ["F Territory != null"], | |
| values: ["V Territory != null"], |
Alternatively, you can use the exists operator (basically ... != null) without an explicit value to check against:
| values: ["F Territory != null"], | |
| values: ["N Territory exists"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With the comment above about the component, this should most likely be
| values: ["F Territory != null"], | |
| values: ["F location exists"], |
|
|
||
| // Territory would to be implemented as Component | ||
| // Implementation of territorial Critter | ||
| componentPresent: "Behaviours:Territory", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think the TerritoryComponent exists in the Behaviors module.
The closest thing we have is TerritoryDistance, a component with two fields distance and location.
Therefore, the referenced component should probably be
| componentPresent: "Behaviours:Territory", | |
| componentPresent: "Behaviours:TerritoryDistance", |
and the referenced field below cannot be Territory (as it does not exist) but either distance or location. I suspect that we can check whether the location is set.
change behaviour system from hard coded to configurable
Use for configuration of different entities to flee from Implement Action in combinedCritter.behavior for new component
adressing review comments
game crash on BehaviourTree initialisation because of NullPointerException
…nt to sheepBase combinedCritter.behaviour crash on Territory stage cause of missing parameters
| creature.saveComponent(territoryComponent); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this unnecessary when we look at the update Function above?
| entity.getComponent(LocationComponent.class).getWorldPosition(new Vector3f())); | ||
| entity.saveComponent(territoryDistance); | ||
| for (EntityRef entity : entityManager.getEntitiesWith(TerritoryComponent.class, LocationComponent.class)) { | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So is this how it its supposed to work for DistanceSquared?
I combined several critter behaviors into one.
Based on the student project in cooperation with @jdrueckert @skaldarnar
Goal is to have an universal behavior which differs based on their configuration not their implementation.