Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 7, 2022. It is now read-only.

Support putting a publicly readable file to S3 bucket #166

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

njsubedi
Copy link

Add an optional boolean parameter named makePublic to the put() method. If makePublic is public, sets ACL: 'public-read' on the params, otherwise sets it to 'private', which is the default behavior. This change is backward compatible.

This PR does not break anything.

Add an optional boolean parameter named `makePublic` to the `put()` method. If `makePublic` is public, sets `ACL: 'public-read'` on the params, otherwise sets it to 'private', which is the default behavior. This change is backward compatible.
@njsubedi njsubedi changed the title Support publicly readable file Support putting a publicly readable file to S3 bucket Jul 20, 2021
@axmad386
Copy link

axmad386 commented Jan 24, 2022

Need this PR to be merged 🥲

@wilforlan
Copy link

Is anyone merging this PR soon?

@axmad386
Copy link

axmad386 commented Jan 30, 2022

Is anyone merging this PR soon?

I made fork of this package @kodepandai/flydrive. You can use it with @kodepandai/flydrive-s3 driver.
In put method, there are additional s3 PutObjectRequest on 3rd params

storage.put(path, content, {
   ContentType: 'image/jpg',
   ACL: 'public-read', //this for make file public
   CacheControl: ....,
   ...etc
})

But, my package only works on Esmodule. I made it for my internal project

@jthomaschewski
Copy link

storage.put(path, content, {
   ContentType: 'image/jpg',
   ACL: 'public-read', //this for make file public
   CacheControl: ....,
   ...etc
})

I'd personally prefer having this third option object with various options rather than making the 3rd parameter a boolean only for the purpose of making the file public.

Thanks for the fork @axmad386 - do you plan to do a PR to have this merged in the original project?

@axmad386
Copy link

axmad386 commented Mar 19, 2022

storage.put(path, content, {
   ContentType: 'image/jpg',
   ACL: 'public-read', //this for make file public
   CacheControl: ....,
   ...etc
})

I'd personally prefer having this third option object with various options rather than making the 3rd parameter a boolean only for the purpose of making the file public.

Thanks for the fork @axmad386 - do you plan to do a PR to have this merged in the original project?

@jthomaschewski I am not sure. I think my fork will break the original one. It's because I am focusing in esm mode. Except I must refactor my code maybe using rollup to support both esm and cjs. But I don't have much time for now. Sorry

@sagarPakhrin
Copy link

Any update on this?
I'm uploading profile pictures on gcs and I need the pictures to be public
If not merged, what's a workaround to make a file public?

@njsubedi
Copy link
Author

njsubedi commented Jul 6, 2022

You can create a custom class that extends this class and override the put function.

export class YourAWSStorage extends AmazonWebServicesS3Storage {
        /**
	 * Creates a new file.
	 * This method will create missing directories on the fly.
	 */
	public async put(location: string, content: Buffer | NodeJS.ReadableStream | string, makePublic: boolean = false): Promise<Response> {
		const params = { Key: location, Body: content, Bucket: this.$bucket, ACL: makePublic ? 'public-read' : 'private' };
		try {
			const result = await this.$driver.upload(params).promise();
			return { raw: result };
		} catch (e) {
			throw handleError(e, location, this.$bucket);
		}
	}

}

@wilforlan
Copy link

Great idea!! @njsubedi, how did I not think about that haha? Thank you!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants