ex.Terminator is a destructor helper for Go

ex.Terminator is an embeddable object providing a destructor mechanism to your objects.

It provides two methods:

• object.Defer to defer closing the resources created by the current object (for example foo.Defer(foo.db.Close)).
• object.Close, once called, executes all of the deferred operations and returns errors if necessary.

Additionally, ex.Terminate helps you find leaks by reporting errors if an object gets garbage-collected without having been closed.

ex.Terminator has several benefits over maintaining your own Close methods:

• Similarly to the defer keyword, it is easier to keep track of what is being closed or not, because both the open and close operations always goes together. Meanwhile, it is very easy to forget about it when writing or maintaining a Close method.
• Errors in manually maintained Close methods are often ignored, and handling it explicitly makes the readability worse. ex.Terminator takes care of that for you, and includes helpful error messages.
• ex.Terminator takes care of closing the resources in the right order, which is easy to get wrong when manually done.

Example

https://go.dev/play/p/wFxNeCnYPLd

type FileRepository struct {
	ex.Terminator
	file *os.File
}

func NewFileRepository() (fileRepo *FileRepository, err error) {
	fileRepo = &FileRepository{}

	fileRepo.file, err = os.Create("data.json")
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	fileRepo.Defer(fileRepo.file.Close)

	fileRepo.Defer(func() error {
		fmt.Println("closing FileRepository")
		return nil
	})

	return fileRepo, nil
}

type DBRepository struct {
	ex.Terminator
	db *sql.DB
}

func NewDBRepository() (dbRepo *DBRepository, err error) {
	dbRepo = &DBRepository{}

	dbRepo.db, err = sql.Open("sqlite3", ":memory:")
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	dbRepo.Defer(dbRepo.db.Close)

	dbRepo.Defer(func() error {
		fmt.Println("closing DBRepository")
		return nil
	})

	return dbRepo, nil
}

type Service struct {
	ex.Terminator
	fileRepo *FileRepository
	dbRepo   *DBRepository
}

func NewService() (service *Service, err error) {
	service = &Service{}

	service.fileRepo, err = NewFileRepository()
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	service.Defer(service.fileRepo.Close)

	service.dbRepo, err = NewDBRepository()
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	service.Defer(service.dbRepo.Close)

	return service, nil
}

func main() {
	service, err := NewService()
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}
	defer service.Close()

	// Output:
	// "closing DBRepository"
	// "closing FileRepository"
}

Is this based on runtime.SetFinalizer?

No. Resources are closed synchronously, meaning that the Close methods still must be called, either via defer, .Defer or manually.

However, ex.Terminator uses runtime.SetFinalizer to help the developers find mistakes: an error message is printed in the console whenever a non-Closed object gets garbage-collected. But this only used for this purpose. Closing the objects is never done in SetFinalizer.

Can I use it outside the constructor?

Yes! Although I only provided examples using the constructor (because it is the most common use case), you can use .Defer in any method and any time of the life-cycle of your objects.

In which order are resources closed?

ex.Terminator follows the same convention than the defer keyword: the last deferred operation is executed first:

fileRepo.Defer(func() error { fmt.Println("closing A"); return nil })
fileRepo.Defer(func() error { fmt.Println("closing B"); return nil })
fileRepo.Defer(func() error { fmt.Println("closing C"); return nil })

Result:

closing C
closing B
closing A

What happens if a deferred Close returns an error?

Even in case of error, all of the deferred functions are always executed. The errors are then returned using errors.Join.

Do I still need to call .Close() manually?

No, but it has to be explicitly deferred instead.

ex.Terminate is designed to keep the concerns strictly separated.

The best way to use it is to follow this rule: the code which creates a resource is always responsible for closing it.

In short, if main calls NewFoo which calls NewBar, then main should defer foo.Close, and foo should defer bar.Close.

This way, you end-up with a hierarchy of Close calls: main calls foo.Close, foo.Close calls bar.Close which in turn might close other resources it's responsible for.

Can I use this struct as a property rather than embedding it?

While I recommend embedding it because I think that it is less error-prone and requires less boilerplate, it is very much possible to encapsulate it instead.

However, it is a trade off because of constraints inherent to the Go language:

• The benefit is that the Defer method will be encapsulated.
• The drawback is that you will manually have to create a Close method to close the terminator.

type Foo struct {
	terminator ex.Terminator
	file       *os.File
}

func NewFoo() *Foo {
	var terminator ex.Terminator

	file, _ := os.Create("data.json")
	terminator.Defer(file.Close)

	return &Foo{
		terminator: terminator,
		file:       file,
	}
}

func (foo *Foo) Close() error {
	return foo.terminator.Close()
}