|
| 1 | +\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran} |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} |
| 4 | +\usepackage{hyperref} |
| 5 | +\usepackage{graphicx} |
| 6 | +\usepackage{booktabs} |
| 7 | +\usepackage{longtable} |
| 8 | +\usepackage{array} |
| 9 | +\usepackage{geometry} |
| 10 | +\geometry{letterpaper, margin=1in} |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +% Title and authors |
| 13 | +\title{SPID Protocol:\\A Practical Consent Framework for Responsible AI Governance} |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +\author{ |
| 16 | +Rick Jewett\\ |
| 17 | +Founder, SPID Protocol\\ |
| 18 | +\texttt{spidprotocol.org} |
| 19 | +} |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +\date{} |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +\begin{document} |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +\maketitle |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +\begin{center} |
| 28 | +\textbf{Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved.}\\ |
| 29 | +© 2025 SPID Protocol Initiative. Do not reproduce without permission. |
| 30 | +\end{center} |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +\vspace{0.2in} |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +% Version Control Table |
| 35 | +\section*{Version Control} |
| 36 | +\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} |
| 37 | +\hline |
| 38 | +\textbf{Version} & \textbf{Date} & \textbf{Author} & \textbf{Notes} \\ |
| 39 | +\hline |
| 40 | +1.0 & May 29, 2025 & Rick Jewett & Initial Full White Paper Release \\ |
| 41 | +\hline |
| 42 | +1.1 & May 30, 2025 & Rick Jewett & Diagram cleanup and formatting corrections \\ |
| 43 | +\hline |
| 44 | +1.2 & June 1, 2025 & Rick Jewett & Regulator submission format applied \\ |
| 45 | +\hline |
| 46 | +\end{tabular} |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +\vspace{0.3in} |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +\begin{abstract} |
| 51 | +The SPID Protocol offers a practical, technical framework for embedding structured consent into AI agent-to-human delivery pipelines. While most AI governance efforts focus on reasoning models, SPID addresses the delivery layer — ensuring lawful, ethical, and transparent delivery of AI-generated interactions at scale. This paper outlines the problem space, structural gaps, solution architecture, real-world use cases, and key claims of the SPID Protocol framework for regulators, strategic buyers, and AI governance stakeholders. |
| 52 | +\end{abstract} |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +% Switch to one column for TOC |
| 55 | +\onecolumn |
| 56 | +\tableofcontents |
| 57 | +\twocolumn |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +% Main Sections |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +\section{The Market Problem} |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +\subsection{The Core System Gap} |
| 64 | +As AI-generated communications scale across voice, text, video, search, CRM, SaaS, and commerce platforms, delivery infrastructure lacks a standardized consent layer. AI models are advancing reasoning capabilities, but delivery remains permissionless, unregulated, and often non-compliant with existing consent laws. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +\subsection{The Regulatory Pressure} |
| 67 | +Regulators will not permit unfettered AI outreach that bypasses consumer consent, TCPA laws, privacy statutes (GDPR, CCPA), and emerging AI risk frameworks (NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act). |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +\subsection{The Economic Shift} |
| 70 | +Scarcity of knowledge is collapsing. As knowledge becomes cheap, human interaction and consent-based access become monetizable assets. Platforms will increasingly compete based on who controls compliant access to trusted human attention. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +\section{SPID Protocol Solution Overview} |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +\subsection{Definition} |
| 75 | +The Smart Packet ID Protocol (SPID) creates a universal, AI-readable identity and consent rail for delivering AI-generated communications across channels. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +\subsection{Key Functions} |
| 78 | +\begin{itemize} |
| 79 | + \item Identity resolution tied to consent state |
| 80 | + \item Permission verification prior to delivery |
| 81 | + \item Actionable metadata attached to each AI output |
| 82 | + \item Immutable audit trail for regulators |
| 83 | + \item Cross-channel portability across voice, text, and agent ecosystems |
| 84 | +\end{itemize} |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +\subsection{Design Principles} |
| 87 | +\begin{itemize} |
| 88 | + \item Decentralized yet interoperable |
| 89 | + \item Human-centric control layer |
| 90 | + \item Compatible with existing regulatory frameworks |
| 91 | + \item Future-proof for AI agent-to-agent transactions |
| 92 | +\end{itemize} |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +\section{Use Case Examples} |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +\subsection{AI Sales Agents} |
| 97 | +SPID enables outbound AI sales assistants to verify consent before initiating calls, messages, or asynchronous Smart Packets, ensuring TCPA-safe operation. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +\subsection{Personal AI Identity} |
| 100 | +Individuals control their own PulseID linked to consent state. Third-party AI agents can request interaction through standardized consent tokens. |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +\subsection{Enterprise SaaS Integrations} |
| 103 | +SPID allows CRM platforms to insert compliant AI outreach into customer pipelines, preserving auditability and regulatory compliance across jurisdictions. |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +\subsection{Medical AI} |
| 106 | +SPID's consent-resolved delivery protects healthcare providers from HIPAA or data privacy violations while enabling AI-powered patient outreach. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +\subsection{Government Applications} |
| 109 | +Government agencies can adopt SPID for permissioned citizen communication using AI assistants without violating due process, privacy, or administrative law. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +\section{Structural Advantages of SPID Protocol} |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +\begin{itemize} |
| 114 | + \item Interoperability across AI platforms and models |
| 115 | + \item Neutral protocol layer decoupled from reasoning models |
| 116 | + \item Extensible metadata fields for future regulatory frameworks |
| 117 | + \item Compatibility with open web standards and APIs |
| 118 | + \item Enables trusted delivery while preserving innovation in reasoning models |
| 119 | +\end{itemize} |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +\section{Claims Summary (Patent Pending)} |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +\begin{itemize} |
| 124 | + \item SPID Protocol enables consent-based AI-to-human and AI-to-agent delivery at scale. |
| 125 | + \item SPID functions as a delivery-layer resolver that verifies permission state prior to AI-generated interaction. |
| 126 | + \item SPID allows regulated industries to adopt AI without increasing legal risk. |
| 127 | + \item SPID operates as a neutral protocol compatible with decentralized identity systems. |
| 128 | + \item SPID creates immutable audit logs of consent states, satisfying future regulatory requirements. |
| 129 | +\end{itemize} |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +\section{Future Roadmap} |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +\begin{itemize} |
| 134 | + \item v1.0 Deployment: Consent Layer for Voice + Smart Packets |
| 135 | + \item v2.0: Consent Management API for SaaS / CRM integrations |
| 136 | + \item v3.0: SPID-Agent Resolver for AI agent-to-agent commerce protocols |
| 137 | + \item v4.0: Global Standards Alignment (ISO, IEEE, NIST, EU AI Act interoperability) |
| 138 | +\end{itemize} |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +\section{Conclusion} |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +SPID Protocol offers a pragmatic solution to one of AI's emerging delivery gaps — how agents deliver content compliantly, transparently, and accountably. As reasoning models advance, governance must evolve beyond model reasoning and into delivery-layer control. SPID Protocol anchors that future. |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +\vspace{0.5in} |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +\begin{center} |
| 147 | +\textbf{SPID Protocol Initiative} \\ |
| 148 | +\texttt{spidprotocol.org} \\ |
| 149 | +\textit{For regulator inquiries, standards contribution, or partnership requests, contact Rick Jewett directly.} |
| 150 | +\end{center} |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +\end{document} |
0 commit comments