Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade redis from 2.10.5 to 4.3.6 #1447

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • tools/requirements.txt

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
low severity 578/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7
Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session
SNYK-PYTHON-REDIS-5291195
redis:
2.10.5 -> 4.3.6
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-REDIS-5291195
@snyk-bot snyk-bot requested a review from danni-m as a code owner March 28, 2023 06:00
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (936e454) 89.19% compared to head (89de83e) 89.19%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1447   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.19%   89.19%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        5599     5599           
=======================================
  Hits         4994     4994           
  Misses        605      605           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants