Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Case study: Juicebox #8427

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

Case study: Juicebox #8427

merged 4 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

Lior539
Copy link
Contributor

@Lior539 Lior539 commented May 8, 2024

Changes

Case study for Juicebox. I was planning on merging it into @joethreepwood's PR for the AI product product, but it's not how that's going to proceed yet.

Article checklist

  • I've checked the preview build of the article
  • The date on the article is today's date

@Lior539 Lior539 requested a review from joethreepwood May 8, 2024 09:24
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
posthog ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview May 24, 2024 8:05am

Copy link
Contributor

@joethreepwood joethreepwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reads fine. I'd like to ideally take it a step deeper and get an actionable story out of this, as that always demonstrates value the best. Can we maybe follow up with them on how they identified and solved a specific latency issue, or else tallk about a specific UX change they made as a result of the replay sessions (and the impact the change had)?

contents/customers/juicebox.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contents/customers/juicebox.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contents/customers/juicebox.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contents/customers/juicebox.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contents/customers/juicebox.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contents/customers/juicebox.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Joe Martin <84011561+joethreepwood@users.noreply.github.com>
@Lior539
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lior539 commented May 20, 2024

Reads fine. I'd like to ideally take it a step deeper and get an actionable story out of this, as that always demonstrates value the best. Can we maybe follow up with them on how they identified and solved a specific latency issue, or else tallk about a specific UX change they made as a result of the replay sessions (and the impact the change had)?

Rereading this case study again after the offsite, I agree that it's missing a actionable insight. I rewatched the recording and its missing depth on this (this is my bad). Im not super well connected to David, so would prefer not to bother him again. I'll ship as is and keep this in mind for following case studies

@Lior539 Lior539 merged commit 34a6216 into master May 24, 2024
3 checks passed
@Lior539 Lior539 deleted the case-study-juicebox branch May 24, 2024 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants