-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Case study: Juicebox #8427
Case study: Juicebox #8427
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reads fine. I'd like to ideally take it a step deeper and get an actionable story out of this, as that always demonstrates value the best. Can we maybe follow up with them on how they identified and solved a specific latency issue, or else tallk about a specific UX change they made as a result of the replay sessions (and the impact the change had)?
Co-authored-by: Joe Martin <84011561+joethreepwood@users.noreply.github.com>
Rereading this case study again after the offsite, I agree that it's missing a actionable insight. I rewatched the recording and its missing depth on this (this is my bad). Im not super well connected to David, so would prefer not to bother him again. I'll ship as is and keep this in mind for following case studies |
Changes
Case study for Juicebox. I was planning on merging it into @joethreepwood's PR for the AI product product, but it's not how that's going to proceed yet.
Article checklist