Skip to content

PeerProducedResearch/design-practices

Best Practices for Peer Production

What is this website about?

This website is thought to be an ever-growing collection of guidelines and best practices for online peer production. It is aimed at web developers and UX designers who want to build peer production platforms, and more generally at people interested in increasing participation in their online projects. The thematic priority is the peer production of research projects in citizen science (because this is what my PhD is about), but the guidelines and features should be applicable to other peer production contexts, too. This project started out as supplementary material for a scientific article I’m writing on this topic (link to the preprint will follow asap). It included lots of research on peer production online platforms, too much to discuss all in detail in an article. Since, to the best of my knowledge, guidelines of this kind don’t exist yet, I hope that my personal notes can be helpful to other people in form of this open online resource, developed as part of the Open Life Science mentoring program. I will also add new features from time to time, if I find something interesting, and you are also cordially invited to contribute!

What is peer production? What is citizen science? Why peer production in citizen science?

Peer production is a way of online distributed knowledge production that relies on the collective intelligence of self-organizing groups of individuals, without or with less rigid hierarchical control and management (Benkler et al., 2015). This mode of knowledge production is most commonly known from projects like Wikipedia or Open Source Software. Thus, provenly, complex knowledge objects, like an encyclopedia or software code can and still continue to be developed in this way. Science, from a very general perspective, can also be framed as the creation of complex knowledge objects, and more and more of these objects take shape as a digital format, e.g. in the form of databases, code or articles (Bechhofer et al., 2010). Citizen science is about involving the public in scientific activities, or more specifically individuals who don’t necessarily have formal academic credentials, like a university degree. This practice holds a connotation of democratizing the access to science as a whole and allows, in some of its variants, participation in several phases of the research cycle or completely autonomous research (Ottinger et al., 2017; Vayena et al., 2015).

To recap: Science is about producing knowledge, citizen science about involving individuals from the public in this process. Peer production is a way of producing knowledge, relying on self-organizing communities with individuals from the public. So why not adopt a peer production approach in citizen science projects?

I discovered some interesting peer production features online that I would like to share. Can I contribute to this blog? Can I use the content of this blog for my own purposes?

Yes! You are cordially invited to add your own blog posts about great peer production features you discovered online (here is a template for blog posts), to update or comment on existing articles. You are also free to reuse the content according to the CC-BY-SA licence (see Licences*).

I am a developer. Can I adapt or use your template?

You are cordially invited to improve the template of this Github pages/Jekyll template. Just send a pull request 😊 You are also free to reuse the code according to the CC-BY-SA/MIT licence (see Licences).

Licences

All content of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

CC BY-SA 4.0

I used the theme 'Mediumish for Jekyll', which was designed and developed by Sal and has been published under MIT license.

References

Bechhofer, S., De Roure, D., Gamble, M., Goble, C., & Buchan, I. (2010). Research objects: Towards exchange and reuse of digital knowledge. Nature Precedings, 1-1.

Benkler, Y., Shaw, A., & Hill, B. M. (2015). Peer production: A form of collective intelligence. Handbook of collective intelligence, 175.

Ottinger, G., Tyfield, D., Lave, R., Randalls, S., & Thorpe, R. (2017). Reconstructing or reproducing? Scientific authority and models of change in two traditions of citizen science. The routledge handbook of the political economy of science, 351, 9781315685397-31.

Vayena, E., & Tasioulas, J. (2015). “We the scientists”: a human right to citizen science. Philosophy & Technology, 28(3), 479-485.

About

This is a resource of design practices for the peer-production of knowledge, meant to serve as inspiration for people who want to build peer-production online platforms.

Topics

Resources

License

Code of conduct

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Sponsor this project

Packages

No packages published