Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add tests for merging lora and validating the dtype #1512

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

winglian
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Comment on lines +107 to +112
cfg.lora_model_dir = cfg.output_dir
cfg.load_in_4bit = False
cfg.load_in_8bit = False
cfg.flash_attention = False
cfg.deepspeed = None
cfg.fsdp = None
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be excluded as the modify_cfg_for_merge should've set it?

Suggested change
cfg.lora_model_dir = cfg.output_dir
cfg.load_in_4bit = False
cfg.load_in_8bit = False
cfg.flash_attention = False
cfg.deepspeed = None
cfg.fsdp = None

cfg.fsdp = None

cfg = modify_cfg_for_merge(cfg)
cfg.merge_lora = True
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's move this setting inside the modify_cfg function as well.

@@ -27,21 +28,26 @@ def do_cli(config: Path = Path("examples/"), **kwargs):
flash_attention=False,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the above section already sets these properties, is it necessary to set it again below?

# pylint: disable=duplicate-code
cfg = DictDefault(
{
"base_model": "JackFram/llama-68m",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, sometimes, this issue can occur for different model types. For ex, previous llama merge was fine, but mistral was not. Do we need to test this for other arch?

cli_args = TrainerCliArgs()
dataset_meta = load_datasets(cfg=cfg, cli_args=cli_args)

train(cfg=cfg, cli_args=cli_args, dataset_meta=dataset_meta)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you need to train a model, maybe a tiny adapter can be uploaded to HF which we use for merge?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants