Update cct.rst possibly making it clearer

[jidanni]

No description provided.

[kbevers]

I disagree with this change. I don't think it is correct to say that cct is an enhancement of proj - it's its own thing with a different purpose. Incidentally you can achieve the same thing with cct as with proj...

[jidanni]

The word "equivalent" seemed even worse to me.

So I'm glad I was going in the right direction to make them seem further apart.

I was just too timid to make them too far apart.

Perhaps you could step in and word it even better. Thanks!

[github-actions]

The PROJ project highly values your contribution and would love to see this work merged! Unfortunately this PR has not had any activity in the last two months and is being automatically marked as "stale". If you think this pull request should be merged, please check

• that all unit tests are passing

• that all comments by reviewers have been addressed

• that there is enough information for reviewers, in particular

  • link to any issues which this pull request fixes

  • add a description of workflows which this pull request fixes

  • add terminal output examples if applicable

• that you have written unit tests where possible
  In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this pull request.
  If there is no further activity on this pull request, it will be closed in a week.

[jidanni]

Well I guess this all will be swept away by the bot.