Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14.0][IMP] stock_buffer_route: Add alternative item type in buffer #308

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 14.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BernatPForgeFlow
Copy link
Member

@BernatPForgeFlow BernatPForgeFlow commented Jul 31, 2023

Depends on #311

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

@BernatPForgeFlow I think here there are several things mixed. Could you keep here only "[IMP] stock_buffer_route: Select route in procurement wizard", and move the other commits to a separate PR (my current thought is that those alternative fields should be either a customization or a separated module) so we can discuss individually?

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow changed the title [14.0][IMP] stock_buffer_route: Select route in procurement wizard [14.0][IMP] stock_buffer_route: Add alternative item type in buffer Jan 15, 2024
@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

@BernatPForgeFlow I think here there are several things mixed. Could you keep here only "[IMP] stock_buffer_route: Select route in procurement wizard", and move the other commits to a separate PR (my current thought is that those alternative fields should be either a customization or a separated module) so we can discuss individually?

Done here #379 and kept this PR for the additional changes.

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

@BernatPForgeFlow could you now solve conflicts?

Considering that the 'Route' field will be used to define a different way to procure, a field called 'Alternative Item Type' is added in the Stock Buffer.
This will help improve the search with the filters and enhance the calculations by taking the alternative route into account.
Considering all buy routes should not be the default behaviour. If this is needed should be in a customized module.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants