Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bnb/dev #205

Closed
wants to merge 22 commits into from
Closed

Bnb/dev #205

wants to merge 22 commits into from

Conversation

bnb32
Copy link
Collaborator

@bnb32 bnb32 commented Mar 29, 2024

Added uncertainty data (EDA) download to era_downloader.py and new data handler DataHandlerNCwithAugmentation (open to better name), to take EDA, temporally interpolate and regrid to ERA5 grid, and "augment" ERA5 (e.g. ERA5 +/- 2 * EDA) data so we can do fwp runs with ERA5 + 2 * EDA and ERA5 - 2 * EDA to represent 95% confidence interval.

@bnb32 bnb32 force-pushed the bnb/dev branch 4 times, most recently from 1d4c5af to 524ea3e Compare April 4, 2024 20:32
@grantbuster
Copy link
Member

Added uncertainty data (EDA) download to era_downloader.py and new data handler DataHandlerNCwithAugmentation (open to better name), to take EDA, temporally interpolate and regrid to ERA5 grid, and "augment" ERA5 (e.g. ERA5 +/- 2 * EDA) data so we can do fwp runs with ERA5 + 2 * EDA and ERA5 - 2 * EDA to represent 95% confidence interval.

Are you still thinking we'll do the ERA +/- EDA_std for a fwp? Or after our conversation are you thinking you'll downscale ensemble members?

Could any of the existing sup3r interpolation models be used for the ERA interpoaltion?

Haven't reviewed yet, just want to check if you're revising this approach based on our convo.

@bnb32 bnb32 marked this pull request as draft April 5, 2024 01:41
@bnb32
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bnb32 commented Apr 5, 2024

Added uncertainty data (EDA) download to era_downloader.py and new data handler DataHandlerNCwithAugmentation (open to better name), to take EDA, temporally interpolate and regrid to ERA5 grid, and "augment" ERA5 (e.g. ERA5 +/- 2 * EDA) data so we can do fwp runs with ERA5 + 2 * EDA and ERA5 - 2 * EDA to represent 95% confidence interval.

Are you still thinking we'll do the ERA +/- EDA_std for a fwp? Or after our conversation are you thinking you'll downscale ensemble members?

Could any of the existing sup3r interpolation models be used for the ERA interpoaltion?

Haven't reviewed yet, just want to check if you're revising this approach based on our convo.

Yeah I'm going to downscale ensemble members. I made some adjustments to the era_downloader for this. I could prob just use the LinearInterp model to go from 60km, 3-hourly to 30km, hourly. Not sure if this type of handler might be useful for other things. Converted to a draft either way since I'll prob need to add some things to get the ensemble downscaling going.

@bnb32 bnb32 closed this May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants