New module: ganon

[jfy133]

Adds a module for ganon classify (note: the other sub commands produce similar-ish log files but are not informative)

• This comment contains a description of changes (with reason)
• CHANGELOG.md has been updated

• There is example tool output for tools in the https://github.com/ewels/MultiQC_TestData repository or attached to this PR:
• Code is tested and works locally (including with --lint flag)
• docs/README.md is updated with link to below
• docs/modulename.md is created
• Everything that can be represented with a plot instead of a table is a plot
• Report sections have a description and help text (with self.add_section)
• There aren't any huge tables with > 6 columns (explain reasoning if so)
• Each table column has a different colour scale to its neighbour, which relates to the data (eg. if high numbers are bad, they're red)
• Module does not do any significant computational work

[jfy133]

Example report:

multiqc_report.zip

Also would be cool if @pirovc (author of ganon), would have a chance to have a look/leave comments if they have time/interest!

[pirovc]

Look good to me! Thanks. Later on statistics by taxonomic level can be included, but first I'd have to output them on the classify or report logs.

[jfy133]

@ewels @vladsavelyev anything else I need to do here for a review?

[ewels]

We accept bribery in the form of biscuits 🍪 😋

We'll get to it soon, just working through the backlog 😊

[jfy133]

[jfy133]

@pirovc I realise this may be out of date now since ganon 2.0 came out - to your knowledge would any changes be required (or any additional info?)

[jfy133]

@vladsavelyev @ewels I'm sure you would check thoroughly anyway, but I've attempted to add the software version and satisfy the new linting rules, but this is my first module with those, so it would be good to check those a bit more closely when you get to this.

[pirovc]

@pirovc I realise this may be out of date now since ganon 2.0 came out - to your knowledge would any changes be required (or any additional info?)

@jfy133 The STDOUT output in the v2 did not change from the late 1.X versions, so it should be alright.