Infrastructure: remove original Mingw from CI process #7201
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I don't think we need it. Signed-off-by: Stephen Lyons <slysven@virginmedia.com>
|
Hey there! Thanks for helping Mudlet improve. 🌟 Test versionsYou can directly test the changes here:
No need to install anything - just unzip and run. |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Lyons <slysven@virginmedia.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Brief overview of PR changes/additions
Eliminates the installation of the original Mingw from our CI process. Apart from anything else it is already installed in the AppVeyor build we do and Mingw-w64 seems to be a more up to date and reliable setup.
Motivation for adding to Mudlet
I don't think we need it.
Other info (issues closed, discussion etc)