Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add MMCP Development Preview #7155

Draft
wants to merge 115 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

jmckisson
Copy link
Contributor

Brief overview of PR changes/additions

Add MMCP Client and Server classes, Lua scriptability, and options for the MudMaster Chat Protocol

Motivation for adding to Mudlet

This is a feature largely requested by players of the Medievia MUD, it allows peer to peer client communication integrated directly into the main console.

Other info (issues closed, discussion etc)

This is a preview as support for MMCP is ultimately desired to be implemented mostly as a Lua package.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2024

Warnings
⚠️ PR makes changes to 19 source files. Double check the scope hasn't gotten out of hand

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 2c4baae

@jmckisson jmckisson changed the title MMCP Development Preview add MMCP Development Preview Feb 18, 2024
@jmckisson
Copy link
Contributor Author

This latest push includes Medievia specific code to support our installer-free distribution. I probably should have started a new renamed branch, will do that next time.. since the path forward for MMCP to be included will be in Lua eventually

@vadi2
Copy link
Member

vadi2 commented Apr 13, 2024

Right, and getting Medievia listed by default is just a matter of putting together a decent, minimum experience for the players.

@jmckisson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Right, and getting Medievia listed by default is just a matter of putting together a decent, minimum experience for the players.

Working on this as well. Current hangups are getting the mapper working and GMCP. I have the mapper mostly working currently however the newbie area is very large with many rooms having the same name so the mapper gets sometimes confused when walking around in a loop and reconnecting the tail end back to an existing mapped room. Editing this to be correct is very tedious.
GMCP is another issue... I have not gotten any acknowledgement from our admin after mentioning it several times. But I will continue to press the issue.

@vadi2
Copy link
Member

vadi2 commented Apr 13, 2024

In the case of same named rooms and same exits, without any identifying information (like a vnum or a hash) one of the ways of getting of getting it fixed would be to go manual and use the visual editor or aliases. It would be very hard for automation to tell one thing apart from the other without outside knowledge.

@jmckisson
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is what I've resorted to trying.. always ran into a snag that somehow confused the mapper regarding which room I am in, and I can't seem to recover after that. I'll take a deeper look soon I am currently strung out between several projects sigh

@vadi2
Copy link
Member

vadi2 commented Apr 13, 2024

Also try using clear moves when things are going wrong, because in case you try to move, fail, and you haven't created a trigger to catch the failed move, the mapper's tracking will be knocked off course.

@jmckisson
Copy link
Contributor Author

/create links

@add-deployment-links
Copy link

Hey there! Thanks for helping Mudlet improve. 🌟

Test versions

You can directly test the changes here:

  • linux: (download pending, check back soon!)
  • osx: (download pending, check back soon!)
  • windows 64 bit: (download pending, check back soon!)
  • windows 32 bit: (download pending, check back soon!)

No need to install anything - just unzip and run.
Let us know if it works well, and if it doesn't, please give details.

@Mudlet Mudlet deleted a comment from add-deployment-links bot May 22, 2024
@vadi2
Copy link
Member

vadi2 commented May 22, 2024

/refresh links

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants