You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello. The electrodes we are using have the distance between each electrode extremely far apart compared to the size of the cell body. However, in kilosort clustering, several electrode-derived spikes belong to one cluster. So, is it possible to do clustering from only one electrode-derived spikes?
Thank you.
Additional Context
The version of kilosort we are using is kilosort 2.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your reply.
We did try it. However, it did not work with kilosort 4 (probably because we are using a very small number of electrodes, 60 electrodes, to record from the retina, not the brain). So I did it with kilosort 2.5, which had a paper that said it recorded retinas, and it worked fine. However, the output results also showed that the response of one cell was taken from multiple electrodes. Even though there is 200µm between the electrodes.
I would be grateful if you could tell me how to solve this problem if you don't mind. Please let me know if there is anything else you would like us to try.
Thank you.
Feature you'd like to see:
Hello. The electrodes we are using have the distance between each electrode extremely far apart compared to the size of the cell body. However, in kilosort clustering, several electrode-derived spikes belong to one cluster. So, is it possible to do clustering from only one electrode-derived spikes?
Thank you.
Additional Context
The version of kilosort we are using is kilosort 2.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: