Skip to content

All questions in your team about how to properly use locks can be answered with "use Locky" from now on. It is very easy to use, because you can lock on strings via both synchronous and asynchronous methods. There is no risk of forgetting to assign something to a static field, because Locky is static itself (or use Lockally which is also included).

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

LockyAndLockally/Locky.CSharp

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

12 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Locky

All questions in your team about how to properly use locks can be answered with "use Locky" from now on. It is very easy to use, because you can lock on strings via both synchronous and asynchronous methods. There is no risk of forgetting to assign something to a static field, because Locky is static itself (or use Lockally which is also included).

Notes:

  • if you want to use Locky in a package, then please use Lockally (also included in this package) to avoid clashing with the consumer of your package.
  • once a string has been used as a lock, it is not removed from the dictionary that is used internally (until your app restarts). Using Locky for a few thousand different strings is probably OK, but start to think about memory usage if you have variable locks such as contract Ids.

Locky logo

Available via NuGet.

What is Locky's interface?

public static class Locky
{
    public static bool TryLock(string s);
    public static void Lock(string s); // optional: cancellationToken
    public static Task LockAsync(string s); // optional: cancellationToken
    public static void Release(string s);
}

How to use Locky?

In Visual Studio's Solution Explorer, right-click a project and click Manage NuGet Packages.... Browse and install "Locky".

Add

using LockyAndLockally;

Using the Lock method

Locky.Lock("Process A");
try
{
    // do some important work...
}
finally
{
    Locky.Release("Process A");
}

Using the TryLock method

if (!Locky.TryLock("Process B"))
{
    // important work is already going on, so let's skip it this time.
    return;
}
try
{
    // do some important work...
}
finally
{
    Locky.Release("Process B");
}

Using the LockAsync method

await Locky.LockAsync("Process C");
try
{
    // do some important work...
}
finally
{
    Locky.Release("Process C");
}

Ok, what's Lockally?

Ehwm... its interface won't surprise either, it's quite simple:

public class Lockally
{
    public bool TryLock(string s);
    public void Lock(string s);
    public Task LockAsync(string s);
    public void Release(string s);
}

If you're creating a library that unkown users will depend on, you probably don't want to tell them "hey, I've used "MySuperLock" as a lock, so you can't use it". If you create a library for your team or for others, then use Lockally like this:

public class SomeClass
{
    private static Lockally _lockally = new();

    public void SomeMethod()
    {
        if (!_lockally.TryLock("Process D"))
        {
            // important work is already going on, so let's skip it this time.
            return; 
        }
        try
        {
            // do some important work...
        }
        finally
        {
            _lockally.Release("Process D");
        }
    }
}

or make a singleton available within only your library in two steps:

Step 1: make an internal static container for a Lockally instance.

using LockyAndLockally;
namespace MyLibrary;

internal static class MyLockyContainer
{
    public static Lockally MyLocky { get; } = new();
}

Step 2: add the container as a static global using to your 'Usings.cs':

global using static MyLibrary.MyLockyContainer;

and use it like this anywhere in your project:

MyLocky.Lock("Hello world!");

Tip

In Visual Studio, place your cursor on the Release method and use Shift F12 to find out what lock names have been used by your colleagues.

About

All questions in your team about how to properly use locks can be answered with "use Locky" from now on. It is very easy to use, because you can lock on strings via both synchronous and asynchronous methods. There is no risk of forgetting to assign something to a static field, because Locky is static itself (or use Lockally which is also included).

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Languages