Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: word api for texter effect #851

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

bigredfrog
Copy link
Contributor

@bigredfrog bigredfrog commented Mar 30, 2024

Very much in development / draft

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced text manipulation in effects, including adding, deleting, and focusing on specific words for more dynamic visual presentations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces enhancements to the text manipulation capabilities within the application. Specifically, it adds new tools for adding, deleting, and focusing on words, alongside a new set of tools for word management. These changes aim to improve user interaction with text effects by providing more control over the content and focus of the displayed text.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../virtuals_tools.py Introduced "add_words", "del_words", "new_words", and "focus_words" tools; added validation logic.
.../effects/texter2d.py Added del_words, add_words, and focus_words methods for enhanced word manipulation in text effects; included word focus handling and logging.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@bigredfrog bigredfrog changed the title Featrure: word api for texter effect Feature: word api for texter effect Mar 30, 2024
@bigredfrog bigredfrog marked this pull request as draft March 30, 2024 13:05
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 81f3d30 and 3e51893.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • ledfx/api/virtuals_tools.py (2 hunks)
  • ledfx/effects/texter2d.py (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (4)
ledfx/api/virtuals_tools.py (3)

13-13: The addition of new tools to the TOOLS list aligns with the PR objectives and enhances the functionality of the VirtualsToolsEndpoint class.


202-226: The implementation of the "add_words" tool is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.


228-252: The implementation of the "del_words" tool is correct and follows the PR objectives.

ledfx/effects/texter2d.py (1)

189-201: The focus_words method includes some logic for handling word focus but lacks clarity on the actual focusing mechanism. Please ensure that the focusing logic is fully implemented and clear.

Comment on lines 176 to 201
if tool == "new_words":
_LOGGER.info(f"new words: {virtual.name} effect is {virtual.active_effect.name}")
if virtual.active_effect.name != "Texter":
return await self.invalid_request(
"Virtual new_words failed, active effect is not texter2d"
)

words = data.get("words")

if words is None:
return await self.invalid_request(
"Required attribute for new_words, words was not provided"
)

if type(words) is not str or len(words) < 1:
return await self.invalid_request(
"new_words words parameter must be a string with at least one character"
)

result = virtual.active_effect.add_words(words, True)

if result is not None:
return await self.invalid_request(
f"new_words failed: {result}"
)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The implementation of the "new_words" tool is correct and follows the PR objectives. However, for consistency, consider aligning the error message when the active effect is not "Texter" with the other tools (e.g., "texter2d" vs "Texter").

- "Virtual new_words failed, active effect is not texter2d"
+ "Virtual new_words failed, active effect is not Texter"

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if tool == "new_words":
_LOGGER.info(f"new words: {virtual.name} effect is {virtual.active_effect.name}")
if virtual.active_effect.name != "Texter":
return await self.invalid_request(
"Virtual new_words failed, active effect is not texter2d"
)
words = data.get("words")
if words is None:
return await self.invalid_request(
"Required attribute for new_words, words was not provided"
)
if type(words) is not str or len(words) < 1:
return await self.invalid_request(
"new_words words parameter must be a string with at least one character"
)
result = virtual.active_effect.add_words(words, True)
if result is not None:
return await self.invalid_request(
f"new_words failed: {result}"
)
if tool == "new_words":
_LOGGER.info(f"new words: {virtual.name} effect is {virtual.active_effect.name}")
if virtual.active_effect.name != "Texter":
return await self.invalid_request(
"Virtual new_words failed, active effect is not Texter"
)
words = data.get("words")
if words is None:
return await self.invalid_request(
"Required attribute for new_words, words was not provided"
)
if type(words) is not str or len(words) < 1:
return await self.invalid_request(
"new_words words parameter must be a string with at least one character"
)
result = virtual.active_effect.add_words(words, True)
if result is not None:
return await self.invalid_request(
f"new_words failed: {result}"
)

Comment on lines 254 to 279
if tool == "focus_words":
_LOGGER.info(
f"focus words: {virtual.name} effect is {virtual.active_effect.name}")
if virtual.active_effect.name != "Texter":
return await self.invalid_request(
"Virtual focus_words failed, active effect is not texter"
)

index = data.get("index")

if index is None:
return await self.invalid_request(
"Required attribute for focus_words, index was not provided"
)

if type(index) is not int or index < 0:
return await self.invalid_request(
"focus_words index parameter must be an integer 0 or greater"
)

result = virtual.active_effect.focus_words(index)

if result is not None:
return await self.invalid_request(
f"focus_words failed: {result}"
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The implementation of the "focus_words" tool is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. However, for consistency, consider aligning the error message when the active effect is not "Texter" with the other tools.

- "Virtual focus_words failed, active effect is not texter"
+ "Virtual focus_words failed, active effect is not Texter"

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if tool == "focus_words":
_LOGGER.info(
f"focus words: {virtual.name} effect is {virtual.active_effect.name}")
if virtual.active_effect.name != "Texter":
return await self.invalid_request(
"Virtual focus_words failed, active effect is not texter"
)
index = data.get("index")
if index is None:
return await self.invalid_request(
"Required attribute for focus_words, index was not provided"
)
if type(index) is not int or index < 0:
return await self.invalid_request(
"focus_words index parameter must be an integer 0 or greater"
)
result = virtual.active_effect.focus_words(index)
if result is not None:
return await self.invalid_request(
f"focus_words failed: {result}"
)
if tool == "focus_words":
_LOGGER.info(
f"focus words: {virtual.name} effect is {virtual.active_effect.name}")
if virtual.active_effect.name != "Texter":
return await self.invalid_request(
"Virtual focus_words failed, active effect is not Texter"
)
index = data.get("index")
if index is None:
return await self.invalid_request(
"Required attribute for focus_words, index was not provided"
)
if type(index) is not int or index < 0:
return await self.invalid_request(
"focus_words index parameter must be an integer 0 or greater"
)
result = virtual.active_effect.focus_words(index)
if result is not None:
return await self.invalid_request(
f"focus_words failed: {result}"
)

Comment on lines +180 to +183
def del_words(self, count):
_LOGGER.info(f"del words: count {count}")
_LOGGER.info(f"existing wordblocks: {self.sentence.wordcount}")

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The del_words method currently only logs information and does not implement the functionality to delete words. Please add the necessary logic to handle word deletion as per the PR objectives.

Comment on lines +184 to +187
def add_words(self, words, clear=False):
_LOGGER.info(f"add words: {words}")
_LOGGER.info(f"clear: {clear}")
_LOGGER.info(f"existing wordblocks: {self.sentence.wordcount}")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The add_words method currently only logs information and does not implement the functionality to add words. Please add the necessary logic to handle word addition as per the PR objectives.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant