Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geodesics_improvements #127

Open
wants to merge 45 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

geodesics_improvements #127

wants to merge 45 commits into from

Conversation

pehf
Copy link
Member

@pehf pehf commented May 7, 2021

includes:

  • conditional geodesics, with corresponding optimization step
  • PC plot
  • factorized steerable pyramids
  • notebook
  • bunch of minor merge conflicts

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 7, 2021

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 28.12% and project coverage change: -2.22% ⚠️

Comparison is base (deb4bc3) 86.77% compared to head (3021dad) 84.55%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #127      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.77%   84.55%   -2.22%     
==========================================
  Files          35       36       +1     
  Lines        3349     3458     +109     
==========================================
+ Hits         2906     2924      +18     
- Misses        443      534      +91     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
...rc/plenoptic/simulate/models/factorized_pyramid.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/plenoptic/tools/data.py 70.96% <ø> (-0.24%) ⬇️
src/plenoptic/synthesize/geodesic.py 74.55% <24.65%> (-23.60%) ⬇️
src/plenoptic/synthesize/metamer.py 91.76% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
src/plenoptic/tools/optim.py 94.44% <100.00%> (-0.56%) ⬇️
src/plenoptic/tools/signal.py 51.47% <100.00%> (+5.56%) ⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pehf pehf mentioned this pull request May 10, 2021
@pehf pehf marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2021 15:35
@billbrod billbrod self-requested a review as a code owner July 24, 2023 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants