Fix: Build arm64 binaries for macOS

[greg-lunarg]

Reverts #2991

Placeholder to reapply #2988. See this previous PR for current status.

[spnda]

Interesting to double-revert a merge. However, I just noticed something: These are continuous deployments, not the continuous integrations. Why are the tests being run at all? The workflows defined in continuous_integration.yml already test every PR and work perfectly fine. These deployments don't need to be tested again, they're only there to provide the binaries. Removing the tests from all of the deployment workflows would not have any disadvantages imo.

[greg-lunarg]

I am just polling a few more folks to decide if it is reasonable to release something that has not been tested. @spnda Can you give any other examples where this is done?

[jeremy-lunarg]

I think we should wait for runner support (github/roadmap#528). It sounds like it might not be that far off.

@spnda We retest in continuous deployment to verify that a merge didn't have unexpected results.

[oscarbg]

Any update?

[arcady-lunarg]

@oscarbg A MacOS arm64 build of glslang is available in the Vulkan SDK. Is there any specific reason you are interested in having this configuration tested in CI?

[oscarbg]

@arcady-lunarg not really.. misunderstood this..

[arcady-lunarg]

This has been implemented by enabling CI to run on macos 14, where the runner is on arm64.