Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Map LinkOnceODR to weak_odr instead of linkonce_odr #2502

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

svenvh
Copy link
Member

@svenvh svenvh commented Apr 12, 2024

The translator currently maps SPIR-V's LinkOnceODR to llvm's linkonce_odr, but that allows llvm to discard unreferenced globals, causing linking failures when linking linkonce_odr symbols from multiple modules. llvm's weak_odr has the same merging semantics as llvm's linkonce_odr, except that unreferenced globals may not be discarded.

SPIR-V's LinkOnceODR is "Same as the Export linkage type but a function or global variable with this linkage type will be merged with other functions or global variables of the same name when linkage occurs". Unreferenced globals with Export linkage (that gets mapped to common or external llvm linkage) are not discarded, so weak_odr seems to be a better fit for LinkOnceODR.

When producing SPIR-V, map both linkonce_odr and weak_odr to LinkOnceODR for backwards compatibility, and add an llvm function with the previous linkonce_odr linkage to the test.

The translator currently maps SPIR-V's `LinkOnceODR` to llvm's
`linkonce_odr`, but that allows llvm to discard unreferenced globals.
llvm's `weak_odr` has the same merging semantics as llvm's
`linkonce_odr`, except that unreferenced globals may not be discarded.

SPIR-V's `LinkOnceODR` is "Same as the `Export` linkage type but a
function or global variable with this linkage type will be merged with
other functions or global variables of the same name when linkage
occurs".  Unreferenced globals with `Export` linkage (that gets mapped
to `common` or `external` llvm linkage) are not discarded, so
`weak_odr` seems to be a better fit for `LinkOnceODR`.

When producing SPIR-V, map both `linkonce_odr` and `weak_odr` to
`LinkOnceODR` for backwards compatibility, and add an llvm function
with the previous `linkonce_odr` linkage to the test.
@asudarsa
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a reason why we named the SPIR-V linkage LinkOnceODR and not WeakODR in the first place? May be we will benefit from adding a new linkage (WeakODR)? Adding @bashbaug for comments. Thanks

Copy link
Contributor

@MrSidims MrSidims left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The patch make sense, but it also feels like a specification bug as the intention for predecessor Intel extension was made to express linkonce_odr without considering weak_odr. Regardless, the patch should be merged as it follows the specification, but may I ask to hold it for a day?

@svenvh
Copy link
Member Author

svenvh commented Apr 15, 2024

Thanks for the comments so far. No problem holding off merging this PR; it would be great to hear what @bashbaug or @Fznamznon think.

@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the comments so far. No problem holding off merging this PR; it would be great to hear what @bashbaug or @Fznamznon think.

I don't mind to merge, worst case we will revert it downstream, as it's a consumer part, not generator.

@svenvh
Copy link
Member Author

svenvh commented Apr 17, 2024

I don't mind to merge, worst case we will revert it downstream

We're not in a rush for this, so we could wait a few more days for folks to step in. I'm quite keen to hear some more thoughts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants