Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: run code coverage in github actions #11770

Merged
merged 27 commits into from Jan 13, 2021
Merged

tests: run code coverage in github actions #11770

merged 27 commits into from Jan 13, 2021

Conversation

connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator

@connorjclark connorjclark commented Dec 4, 2020

This also replaces istanbul with c8, as coverage using istanbul has started to crash node.

part of #11194

fixes #11781

@connorjclark connorjclark requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2020 16:39
@connorjclark connorjclark requested review from Beytoven and removed request for a team December 4, 2020 16:39
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Dec 4, 2020
@connorjclark connorjclark changed the title WIP: tests: run codevoc in github actions WIP: tests: run code coverage in github actions Dec 7, 2020
@thomasrockhu
Copy link

Tom from Codecov here. I'm not sure why statuses haven't come up, but if you push a new commit here, I can take a look!

@thomasrockhu
Copy link

thomasrockhu commented Dec 28, 2020

At first glance, looks like this is the problem. My guess is we do not properly handle the emojis (💡🏠) as workflow/job names. I'll open up a ticket with the product team about this, and I'll work on a fix in the uploader to deploy this week or next.

@connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Great find, thanks for the help!

Ahh, vindication...can we remove these emojis now folks? :)

Copy link
Member

@brendankenny brendankenny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really excited about this! Can we land? Seems like we could figure out the emoji thing afterwards

.travis.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
* promise. Instead, map to a successful object that contains this information.
* @param {string|Error} err The error to convert
*/
/* istanbul ignore next */
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe worth adding to the fileoverview that this whole file is ignored for code coverage since it's intended to run in the browser?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that information useful to someone looking/editing/using functions form this module? Seems a concern only if you are looking at how c8 works, and naturally you'd be looking at c8.sh.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that information useful to someone looking/editing/using functions form this module?

I think so. There's coverage magic going on and the only way to figure out why e.g. a new page function in here doesn't have to be ignored while a new page function that's defined within a gatherer file does have to be ignored is to know you have to look in c8.sh in the first place

"unit-cli": "jest \"lighthouse-cli/\"",
"unit-viewer": "jest \"lighthouse-viewer/.*-test.js\"",
"unit": "yarn unit-core && yarn unit-cli && yarn unit-viewer",
"unit:ci": "npm run unit-core -- --runInBand --ci --coverage && npm run unit-cli -- --runInBand --ci --coverage && npm run unit-viewer -- --runInBand --ci --coverage",
"unit:ci": "NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=4096 npm run unit-core -- --ci && npm run unit-cli -- --ci && npm run unit-viewer -- --ci",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=4096

is this still necessary? Seems like you added it originally for fixing jest coverage, not c8 coverage?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, just saw it fails without in ubuntu

yarn.lock Outdated
"@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@*", "@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@^2.0.0":
version "2.0.1"
resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/istanbul-lib-coverage/-/istanbul-lib-coverage-2.0.1.tgz#42995b446db9a48a11a07ec083499a860e9138ff"
integrity sha512-hRJD2ahnnpLgsj6KWMYSrmXkM3rm2Dl1qkx6IOFD5FnuNPXJIG5L0dhgKXCYTRMGzU4n0wImQ/xfmRc4POUFlg==

"@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@^2.0.1":
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

relatively minor, but if you want to eliminate some unneeded duplicate new deps:

diff --git a/yarn.lock b/yarn.lock
index 96b73a0bd..6b74d3fb5 100644
--- a/yarn.lock
+++ b/yarn.lock
@@ -566,12 +566,7 @@
   resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/is-windows/-/is-windows-1.0.0.tgz#1011fa129d87091e2f6faf9042d6704cdf2e7be0"
   integrity sha512-tJ1rq04tGKuIJoWIH0Gyuwv4RQ3+tIu7wQrC0MV47raQ44kIzXSSFKfrxFUOWVRvesoF7mrTqigXmqoZJsXwTg==
 
-"@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@*", "@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@^2.0.0":
-  version "2.0.1"
-  resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/istanbul-lib-coverage/-/istanbul-lib-coverage-2.0.1.tgz#42995b446db9a48a11a07ec083499a860e9138ff"
-  integrity sha512-hRJD2ahnnpLgsj6KWMYSrmXkM3rm2Dl1qkx6IOFD5FnuNPXJIG5L0dhgKXCYTRMGzU4n0wImQ/xfmRc4POUFlg==
-
-"@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@^2.0.1":
+"@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@*", "@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@^2.0.0", "@types/istanbul-lib-coverage@^2.0.1":
   version "2.0.3"
   resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/istanbul-lib-coverage/-/istanbul-lib-coverage-2.0.3.tgz#4ba8ddb720221f432e443bd5f9117fd22cfd4762"
   integrity sha512-sz7iLqvVUg1gIedBOvlkxPlc8/uVzyS5OwGz1cKjXzkl3FpL3al0crU8YGU1WoHkxn0Wxbw5tyi6hvzJKNzFsw==
@@ -3501,19 +3496,7 @@ glob-to-regexp@^0.3.0:
   resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/glob-to-regexp/-/glob-to-regexp-0.3.0.tgz#8c5a1494d2066c570cc3bfe4496175acc4d502ab"
   integrity sha1-jFoUlNIGbFcMw7/kSWF1rMTVAqs=
 
-glob@^7.0.0, glob@^7.0.3, glob@^7.1.0, glob@^7.1.1, glob@^7.1.2, glob@^7.1.3:
-  version "7.1.4"
-  resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/glob/-/glob-7.1.4.tgz#aa608a2f6c577ad357e1ae5a5c26d9a8d1969255"
-  integrity sha512-hkLPepehmnKk41pUGm3sYxoFs/umurYfYJCerbXEyFIWcAzvpipAgVkBqqT9RBKMGjnq6kMuyYwha6csxbiM1A==
-  dependencies:
-    fs.realpath "^1.0.0"
-    inflight "^1.0.4"
-    inherits "2"
-    minimatch "^3.0.4"
-    once "^1.3.0"
-    path-is-absolute "^1.0.0"
-
-glob@^7.1.4:
+glob@^7.0.0, glob@^7.0.3, glob@^7.1.0, glob@^7.1.1, glob@^7.1.2, glob@^7.1.3, glob@^7.1.4:
   version "7.1.6"
   resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/glob/-/glob-7.1.6.tgz#141f33b81a7c2492e125594307480c46679278a6"
   integrity sha512-LwaxwyZ72Lk7vZINtNNrywX0ZuLyStrdDtabefZKAY5ZGJhVtgdznluResxNmPitE0SAO+O26sWTHeKSI2wMBA==
@@ -8328,7 +8311,7 @@ yargs@^15.0.0, yargs@^15.3.1:
     y18n "^4.0.0"
     yargs-parser "^18.1.2"
 
-yargs@^16.0.0:
+yargs@^16.0.0, yargs@^16.1.1:
   version "16.2.0"
   resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/yargs/-/yargs-16.2.0.tgz#1c82bf0f6b6a66eafce7ef30e376f49a12477f66"
   integrity sha512-D1mvvtDG0L5ft/jGWkLpG1+m0eQxOfaBvTNELraWj22wSVUMWxZUvYgJYcKh6jGGIkJFhH4IZPQhR4TKpc8mBw==
@@ -8341,19 +8324,6 @@ yargs@^16.0.0:
     y18n "^5.0.5"
     yargs-parser "^20.2.2"
 
-yargs@^16.1.1:
-  version "16.1.1"
-  resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/yargs/-/yargs-16.1.1.tgz#5a4a095bd1ca806b0a50d0c03611d38034d219a1"
-  integrity sha512-hAD1RcFP/wfgfxgMVswPE+z3tlPFtxG8/yWUrG2i17sTWGCGqWnxKcLTF4cUKDUK8fzokwsmO9H0TDkRbMHy8w==
-  dependencies:
-    cliui "^7.0.2"
-    escalade "^3.1.1"
-    get-caller-file "^2.0.5"
-    require-directory "^2.1.1"
-    string-width "^4.2.0"
-    y18n "^5.0.5"
-    yargs-parser "^20.2.2"
-
 yauzl@^2.10.0:
   version "2.10.0"
   resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/yauzl/-/yauzl-2.10.0.tgz#c7eb17c93e112cb1086fa6d8e51fb0667b79a5f9"

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an automated process to do what you're doing manually?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an automated process to do what you're doing manually?

I haven't seen any good tools that will de-dupe but try to minimize the churn but I haven't looked in a while

Copy link
Member

@brendankenny brendankenny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops, meant to approve :)

@thomasrockhu
Copy link

The issue should be resolved on the Codecov side now @connorjclark

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

codecov OOM crash
8 participants