Review #9
Open
Review #9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There is still various things missing in places so I haven't commented on those. In general it looks good, one or two places where things need to be tightened up and conclusions need to be strengthened. In your chapter on further work/conclusion/contribution you'll highlight that this data set of best response sequences has been produced.
Add comments.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey @GitToby hope you are having a nice break.
This
PRcontains our review of your report. There is amain.pdffile inrwfolder which has our comments. Let me know if you can view them.Also from commit 201ae6d, Vince: