Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed RngWitnet#isRequestFailed so that checks the specific request id #6

Conversation

asselstine
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

LCOV of commit ba33ff0 during Tests with 100% Coverage #37

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 93.9% (31 of 33 lines)
  functions..: 100.0% (16 of 16 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate:
                   |Lines       |Functions  |Branches    
  Filename         |Rate     Num|Rate    Num|Rate     Num
  =======================================================
  src/RngWitnet.sol|96.0%     25| 100%    12|    -      0

⛔ The code coverage is too low. Expected at least 100.

Copy link

LCOV of commit 6cb46a8 during Tests with 100% Coverage #39

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 93.9% (31 of 33 lines)
  functions..: 100.0% (16 of 16 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate:
                   |Lines       |Functions  |Branches    
  Filename         |Rate     Num|Rate    Num|Rate     Num
  =======================================================
  src/RngWitnet.sol|96.0%     25| 100%    12|    -      0

⛔ The code coverage is too low. Expected at least 100.

Copy link

LCOV of commit fecf3cd during Tests with 100% Coverage #41

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 93.9% (31 of 33 lines)
  functions..: 100.0% (16 of 16 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate:
                   |Lines       |Functions  |Branches    
  Filename         |Rate     Num|Rate    Num|Rate     Num
  =======================================================
  src/RngWitnet.sol|96.0%     25| 100%    12|    -      0

⛔ The code coverage is too low. Expected at least 100.

Copy link

LCOV of commit 7e6e69d during Tests with 100% Coverage #45

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 97.0% (32 of 33 lines)
  functions..: 100.0% (16 of 16 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate:
                   |Lines       |Functions  |Branches    
  Filename         |Rate     Num|Rate    Num|Rate     Num
  =======================================================
  src/RngWitnet.sol| 100%     25| 100%    12|    -      0

⛔ The code coverage is too low. Expected at least 100.

Copy link

LCOV of commit 2e705d6 during Tests with 100% Coverage #47

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 100.0% (33 of 33 lines)
  functions..: 100.0% (16 of 16 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate:
                   |Lines       |Functions  |Branches    
  Filename         |Rate     Num|Rate    Num|Rate     Num
  =======================================================
  src/Requestor.sol| 100%      8| 100%     4|    -      0
  src/RngWitnet.sol| 100%     25| 100%    12|    -      0

@asselstine asselstine merged commit ac310b9 into main May 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@asselstine asselstine deleted the gen-1581-rngwitnet-isrequestfailed-returns-the-latest-request-not-the branch May 14, 2024 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant