Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor Accessibility Testing #3814

Merged
merged 33 commits into from May 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jperson1
Copy link
Contributor

@jperson1 jperson1 commented May 9, 2024

Refactor Accessibility Testing

Issue: #3618

Drafting initially to ensure GHA workflows work properly.

Brief overview:

  1. Added cypress-axe to run accessibility tests
  2. Added an accessibility cypress spec to check all the things! The home/submission/access/search pages are all covered.
  3. Changed the load_fixtures command to add a few more SACs per user, and some dummy dissemination data.
  4. Changed the PR workflow to include the new tests, so they run every time we make a PR/merge a branch.

Changes:

  1. Package/package lock changes for cypress-axe.
  2. New accessibility cypress spec.
  3. Cypress log functions to properly display accessibility errors in table format (includes links to the requirements).
  4. Update to load_fixtures management command to support the new tests.
  5. Allow access to SACs without permission if DISABLE_AUTH=True. Similarly, allow access to the homepage without redirection if DISABLE_AUTH=True.
  6. Minor full submission changes to line up with new HTML id's.
  7. All the HTML/SCSS changes to get accessibility up to date. See full log below.

How to test:

Please follow the instructions in the "Accessibility" section of testing.md. But basically:

  1. Run with DISABLE_AUTH=True
  2. Run the load_fixtures management command in the docker container after "logging in" once.
  3. Run the accessibility spec via Cypress.

All the accessibility changes by page:

Sometimes, you just need h1's.

All pages:
1. Buttons in pop out primary nav should have aria labels or discernible text.
4. Removed all `aria-controls` references to 'report-cancel'. It existed briefly, then didn't. 

Home page:
1. <ul> elements in homepage should only contain <li>.
2. Remove the `aria-controls` for the login modal if auth is disabled. `aria-controls` should always point to something.

Search pages:
1. The orientation modal link should have an aria label.
2. The h2 header should be an h1.
5. The grey "search" text should be darker.
6. The search info boxes should have higher level headers.

Summary page:
1. The title needs to be an h1.
2. The greyed out text for empty findings/notes/whatever should be a little darker.

Submission checklist page:
1. Key info boxes should have unique aria labels
2. The top level <ul> should contain only <li>'s. Divs are swapped over.

Audit info page:
1. The dollar threshold doesn't have an implicit label, so it's been given an explicit `aria-label`.

Report upload page:
1. Process list h4's should be h2's (process order).
2. Page number inputs were missing implicit labels. Ids changed to match the corresponding label 'for' element.
3. Moved the <ol> down a few levels to ensure it only directly contains <li>'s.

Workbook upload page:
1. <h1> needs to exist
2. To keep ordering, <h4> becomes <h2>

Access management pages:
1. <h1> needs to exist
2. Remove `aria-controls` that don't point at anything.

Lock for certification page:
1. <h1> needs to exist
2. Remove `aria-controls` that don't point at anything.

Certification pages:
1. <h1>'s need to exist.
2. <h3>'s need to be <h2>'s. Class changes to maintain font size. 

Some funky fresh screenshots:

Cypress accessibility test results (headless mode):
image

An accessibility error during Cypress tests (standalone mode):
image

PR checklist: submitters

  • Link to an issue if possible. If there’s no issue, describe what your branch does. Even if there is an issue, a brief description in the PR is still useful.
  • List any special steps reviewers have to follow to test the PR. For example, adding a local environment variable, creating a local test file, etc.
  • For extra credit, submit a screen recording like this one.
  • Make sure you’ve merged main into your branch shortly before creating the PR. (You should also be merging main into your branch regularly during development.)
  • Make sure you’ve accounted for any migrations. When you’re about to create the PR, bring up the application locally and then run git status | grep migrations. If there are any results, you probably need to add them to the branch for the PR. Your PR should have only one new migration file for each of the component apps, except in rare circumstances; you may need to delete some and re-run python manage.py makemigrations to reduce the number to one. (Also, unless in exceptional circumstances, your PR should not delete any migration files.)
  • Make sure that whatever feature you’re adding has tests that cover the feature. This includes test coverage to make sure that the previous workflow still works, if applicable.
  • Make sure the full-submission.cy.js Cypress test passes, if applicable.
  • Do manual testing locally. Our tests are not good enough yet to allow us to skip this step. If that’s not applicable for some reason, check this box.
  • Verify that no Git surgery was necessary, or, if it was necessary at any point, repeat the testing after it’s finished.
  • Once a PR is merged, keep an eye on it until it’s deployed to dev, and do enough testing on dev to verify that it deployed successfully, the feature works as expected, and the happy path for the broad feature area (such as submission) still works.

PR checklist: reviewers

  • Pull the branch to your local environment and run make docker-clean; make docker-first-run && docker compose up; then run docker compose exec web /bin/bash -c "python manage.py test"
  • Manually test out the changes locally, or check this box to verify that it wasn’t applicable in this case.
  • Check that the PR has appropriate tests. Look out for changes in HTML/JS/JSON Schema logic that may need to be captured in Python tests even though the logic isn’t in Python.
  • Verify that no Git surgery is necessary at any point (such as during a merge party), or, if it was, repeat the testing after it’s finished.

The larger the PR, the stricter we should be about these points.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

Terraform plan for meta

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.s3-backups.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/s3-backups/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #679

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

Terraform plan for dev

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.dev.module.cg-logshipper.module.s3-logshipper-storage.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/dev.cg-logshipper.s3-logshipper-storage/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 4 more similar warnings elsewhere)

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #679

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

File Coverage Missing
All files 87%
api/serializers.py 88% 177-178 183 188
api/test_views.py 95% 103
api/uei.py 88% 87 118-119 163 167-168
api/views.py 98% 198-199 337-338
audit/forms.py 60% 31-38 109-116
audit/intake_to_dissemination.py 88% 57-62 264 308-316
audit/mixins.py 96% 28
audit/test_commands.py 91%
audit/test_intakelib.py 88% 154-158
audit/test_manage_submission_access_view.py 98% 15 19
audit/test_mixins.py 90% 159-160 164-166 254-255 259-261
audit/test_validators.py 95% 439 443 611-612 851 858 865 872 1117-1118 1149-1150 1175-1180
audit/test_views.py 98% 132
audit/test_workbooks_should_fail.py 88% 58 87-88 92
audit/test_workbooks_should_pass.py 87% 59 74-76
audit/utils.py 86% 9 19 60-62 65
audit/validators.py 93% 138 190 272 412-413 428-429 512-513 615-619 624-628 644-653
audit/cross_validation/additional_ueis.py 93% 33
audit/cross_validation/check_award_ref_declaration.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_award_reference_uniqueness.py 93%
audit/cross_validation/check_certifying_contacts.py 87%
audit/cross_validation/check_findings_count_consistency.py 91%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_cap.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_findings_text.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/errors.py 78% 30 77
audit/cross_validation/naming.py 93% 229
audit/cross_validation/submission_progress_check.py 91% 83 126 174 182-183
audit/cross_validation/tribal_data_sharing_consent.py 81% 33 36 40
audit/cross_validation/validate_general_information.py 65% 77 81-84 96 99
audit/fixtures/dissemination.py 71% 38
audit/fixtures/single_audit_checklist.py 55% 160-197 245-254
audit/intakelib/exceptions.py 71% 7-9 12
audit/intakelib/intermediate_representation.py 91% 27-28 73 91 129 200-203 212-213 283-284
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings.py 97% 55
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings_text.py 97% 54
audit/intakelib/mapping_federal_awards.py 93% 92
audit/intakelib/mapping_util.py 79% 21 25 29 63 99 104-105 114-120 130 145 150
audit/intakelib/checks/check_all_unique_award_numbers.py 79% 24
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_names.py 75% 20-25
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_total.py 95% 99
audit/intakelib/checks/check_finding_reference_pattern.py 73% 31 41-42
audit/intakelib/checks/check_has_all_the_named_ranges.py 95% 66
audit/intakelib/checks/check_is_a_workbook.py 69% 20
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_balance_entries.py 83% 28
audit/intakelib/checks/check_look_for_empty_rows.py 91% 18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_major_program_no_type.py 76% 18 27
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_repeat_findings.py 88% 21
audit/intakelib/checks/check_other_cluster_names.py 81% 23 33
audit/intakelib/checks/check_passthrough_name_when_no_direct.py 83% 11 49 58
audit/intakelib/checks/check_sequential_award_numbers.py 82% 25 35
audit/intakelib/checks/check_start_and_end_rows_of_all_columns_are_same.py 89% 14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_state_cluster_names.py 81% 23 33
audit/intakelib/checks/check_version_number.py 73% 30 40-41
audit/intakelib/checks/runners.py 97% 157
audit/intakelib/common/util.py 90% 22 39
audit/intakelib/transforms/xform_rename_additional_notes_sheet.py 81% 14
audit/management/commands/load_fixtures.py 47% 40-46
audit/models/models.py 85% 58 60 65 67 209 215 227 239-242 260 437 455-456 464 486 584-585 589 597 606 612
audit/views/audit_info_form_view.py 27% 25-74 77-117 120-137
audit/views/manage_submission.py 86% 73-80
audit/views/manage_submission_access.py 98% 113-114
audit/views/pre_dissemination_download_view.py 78% 15-16 21-22 29-39
audit/views/submission_progress_view.py 89% 117 182-183
audit/views/tribal_data_consent.py 34% 23-41 44-79
audit/views/unlock_after_certification.py 57% 28-51 73-87
audit/views/upload_report_view.py 26% 32-35 44 91-117 120-170 178-209
audit/views/views.py 53% 74 81-100 123-124 198-199 220-230 257 268-269 280-281 283-287 329-342 345-359 364-377 394-400 405-425 452-456 461-490 533-537 542-562 589-593 598-627 670-674 679-691 694-704 709-721 754-768
census_historical_migration/change_record.py 98% 30
census_historical_migration/end_to_end_core.py 33% 56-88 92-110 115-146 152-178 227-239 244 254-288
census_historical_migration/invalid_record.py 93% 48 52 56 60 64
census_historical_migration/migration_result.py 75% 17 21 25 29 33-42 46
census_historical_migration/test_federal_awards_xforms.py 99% 214-215
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/audit_information.py 92% 24 78
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/cognizant_oversight.py 68% 11
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/general_information.py 91% 166-167 177-178 186-187 195-200 250 319
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/sac_creator.py 90% 34
census_historical_migration/sac_general_lib/utils.py 83% 33 60-69
census_historical_migration/transforms/xform_remove_hyphen_and_pad_zip.py 92% 18
census_historical_migration/transforms/xform_retrieve_uei.py 67% 10
census_historical_migration/transforms/xform_string_to_bool.py 87% 17
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/additional_eins.py 84% 58-60 67-77
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/additional_ueis.py 77% 27-29 36-46
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/corrective_action_plan.py 83% 47-49 91-108
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/excel_creation_utils.py 65% 99 108-113 118-125 129-147 160-164 178-181
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/federal_awards.py 77% 129-132 360 401-409 419-444 468-469 689-790
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/findings.py 47% 75-80 148-168 173-193 210-212 219-241
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/findings_text.py 83% 47-48 90-108
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/notes_to_sefa.py 66% 34-38 101-102 104-105 107-108 136-143 152-160 168-170 279-326
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/post_upload_utils.py 21% 22-35 66-83 89-111
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/secondary_auditors.py 90% 128-130 162-180
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/workbook_builder.py 38% 14-17 26-41
census_historical_migration/workbooklib/workbook_builder_loader.py 41% 18-30
config/error_handlers.py 94% 22
config/test_settings.py 92% 33-34 49-50
config/urls.py 72% 88
dissemination/file_downloads.py 81% 43-61 91-93
dissemination/forms.py 87% 135 144 255
dissemination/search.py 61% 101 108 110 113-121
dissemination/summary_reports.py 78% 274 300-302 306-310 421 438 459 511-575 603 638-640 664-672
dissemination/test_search.py 93% 51-66 473-474 579-596 608-632 644-669 677-693
dissemination/test_summary_reports.py 98%
dissemination/views.py 76% 134 140-142 159-223 266 296 298 332 383 385 387 465-470
dissemination/migrations/0002_general_fac_accepted_date.py 47% 10-12
dissemination/searchlib/search_alns.py 37% 44-58 78-110 115-177 184-187
dissemination/searchlib/search_direct_funding.py 86% 21-22
dissemination/searchlib/search_findings.py 76% 18-24 34 36 38
dissemination/searchlib/search_general.py 96% 138
dissemination/searchlib/search_passthrough_name.py 35% 21-31
djangooidc/backends.py 78% 32 57-63
djangooidc/exceptions.py 66% 19 21 23 28
djangooidc/oidc.py 16% 32-35 45-51 64-70 92-149 153-199 203-226 230-275 280-281 286
djangooidc/views.py 81% 22 43 109-110 117
djangooidc/tests/common.py 97%
report_submission/forms.py 92% 35
report_submission/test_views.py 98% 796
report_submission/views.py 77% 90 235 259-260 265-266 306-476 479-489 548 584-586 594-595 598-600
report_submission/templatetags/get_attr.py 76% 8 11-14 18
support/admin.py 88% 76 79 84 91-97 100-102
support/cog_over.py 91% 30-33 93 145
support/test_admin_api.py 81% 23 147-148 237-238 317-318
support/test_cog_over.py 98% 134-135 224
support/management/commands/seed_cog_baseline.py 98% 20-21
support/models/cog_over.py 89% 103-104
tools/update_program_data.py 89% 96
users/admin.py 99% 27
users/auth.py 96% 58-59
users/models.py 96% 18 74-75
users/fixtures/user_fixtures.py 91%

Minimum allowed coverage is 85%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against ecd9cfa

@jperson1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Testing this branch from GitHub Actions has proven difficult - to ensure this doesn't hang for too long, I've un-drafted it without the workflow changes. A later PR can pick up workflow changes to get a11y tests running on every PR.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great addition!

Copy link
Contributor

@danswick danswick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small thing we can tackle next week (happy to help): let's remove the old test_a11y commands and dependencies and do a sweep for straggler config or helper files previously used for pa11y and maybe lighthouse (though I'm not sure if there are other reasons to keep it around).

We should replace the old a11y npm commands with new ones for cypress. It might be useful to add a local-specific npm command that automatically loads fixtures as well.

docs/testing.md Outdated
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for updating the docs! This is excellent.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great idea 👍

@danswick
Copy link
Contributor

This is really excellent, @jperson1! It looks fairly feature-complete to me, but I think we need to do a sweep for a couple pa11y stragglers just to make sure.

danswick
danswick previously approved these changes May 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@danswick danswick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates, @jperson1! For good measure, I ran the a11y tests manually and everything looks great here.

@jperson1 jperson1 added this pull request to the merge queue May 23, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit d3c61a2 May 23, 2024
12 checks passed
@jperson1 jperson1 deleted the jp/3618-refactor-accessibility-testing branch May 23, 2024 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants